07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.3 KEY TECHNICAL AND PRACTICAL POINTS OF HARTREE–FOCK THEORY 189<br />

the doubly occupied orbitals. To appreciate this point, let us return to the methyl radical.<br />

Note that because the unpaired spin in this molecule is in the carbon 2pz orbital, the plane<br />

containing the atoms, which is the nodal plane for the 2pz orbital, must have zero spin<br />

density. This being the case, electron spin resonance experiments should detect zero hyperfine<br />

coupling between the magnetic moments <strong>of</strong> the hydrogen atoms (or <strong>of</strong> a 13 C nucleus) and<br />

the unpaired electron. However, even after correcting for the effects <strong>of</strong> molecular vibrations,<br />

it is clear that there is a coupling between the two.<br />

Spin density is found in the molecular plane because <strong>of</strong> spin polarization, which is an effect<br />

arising from exchange correlation. The Fermi hole that surrounds the unpaired electron allows<br />

other electrons <strong>of</strong> the same spin to localize above and below the molecular plane slightly<br />

more than can electrons <strong>of</strong> opposite spin. Thus, if the unpaired electron is α, we would expect<br />

there to be a slight excess <strong>of</strong> β density in the molecular plane; as a result, the 1 H hyperfine<br />

splitting should be negative (see Section 9.1.3), and this is indeed the situation observed<br />

experimentally. An ROHF wave function, because it requires the spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> both<br />

spins in the doubly occupied orbitals to be identical, cannot represent this physically realistic<br />

situation.<br />

To permit the α and β spins to occupy different regions <strong>of</strong> space, it is necessary to treat<br />

them individually in the construction <strong>of</strong> the molecular orbitals. Following this formalism,<br />

we would rewrite our methyl radical wave function Eq. (6.6) as<br />

2 =<br />

<br />

<br />

C1s α C1s ′β α ′β<br />

σ σ CHa CHaσ α ′β<br />

σ CHb CHbσ α ′β<br />

σ CHc CHcC2pα <br />

z<br />

(6.7)<br />

where the prime notation on each β orbital emphasizes that while it may be spatially similar<br />

to the analogous α orbital, it need not be identical. The individual orbitals are found by<br />

carrying out separate HF calculations for each spin, with the spin-specific Fock operator<br />

now defined as<br />

F ξ µν =<br />

<br />

<br />

µ <br />

−1 2 ∇2<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

ν<br />

+ <br />

λσ<br />

<br />

<br />

µ <br />

1 <br />

<br />

ν<br />

<br />

nuclei <br />

− Zk<br />

rk<br />

k<br />

<br />

P α <br />

β<br />

λσ + Pλσ (µν|λσ ) − P ξ<br />

λσ (µλ|νσ)<br />

where ξ is either α or β, and the two spin-density matrices are defined as<br />

P ξ<br />

λσ =<br />

ξ−occupied <br />

i<br />

a ξ<br />

λi aξ<br />

σi<br />

<br />

(6.8)<br />

(6.9)<br />

where the coefficients a are the usual ones expressing the MOs in the AO basis, but there are<br />

separate sets for the α and β orbitals. Notice, then, that in Eq. (6.8), the Coulomb repulsion<br />

(the first set <strong>of</strong> integrals in the double sum) is calculated with both spins, but exchange (the<br />

second set <strong>of</strong> integrals) is calculated only with identical spins. Because the SCF is being<br />

carried out separately for each spin, the two density matrices can differ, which is to say the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!