07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

528 15 ADIABATIC REACTION DYNAMICS<br />

which shows that the slope <strong>of</strong> such a plot should be −H o,‡ /R and the intercept is a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> S o,‡ /R. With these quantities in hand, the activation free energy may be easily<br />

computed for any temperature within the range <strong>of</strong> the data points and compared directly to a<br />

theoretical computation <strong>of</strong> this quantity (extrapolation outside the range <strong>of</strong> the data points can<br />

be dangerous because enthalpy and entropy are themselves both dependent on temperature, so<br />

it represents an approximation to assume their constancy over a given measurement range).<br />

An alternative analysis having a long history, however, is to simply plot ln k vs. 1/T,this<br />

procedure being motivated by the empirically derived Arrhenius expression<br />

k = Ae −Ea/RT<br />

(15.30)<br />

where A is the so-called pre-exponential factor and Ea is the Arrhenius activation energy.<br />

Rearranging Eq. (15.30) readily illustrates that a plot <strong>of</strong> ln k vs. 1/T will have slope −Ea/R<br />

and intercept ln A. Simple algebra allows us to express the relationships between the Arrhenius<br />

quantities and the thermodynamic quantities as<br />

and<br />

Ea = H o,‡ + RT (15.31)<br />

A = kBT<br />

h e(1+So,‡ /R)<br />

(15.32)<br />

Because these two different conventions exist (as well as other conventions, e.g., one based<br />

on collision theory, that will not be discussed here), when the term ‘activation energy’ is used<br />

without qualification, it is critical for accurate comparisons that it be established whether<br />

this term refers to an Arrhenius activation energy, a TST activation free energy, a difference<br />

in stationary-point potential energies, a difference in zero-point-including stationary-point<br />

potential energies, etc. The term ‘barrier’ is also <strong>of</strong>ten used ambiguously, and care should<br />

be taken to establish its meaning in a given situation.<br />

One point <strong>of</strong> interest deriving from the equations <strong>of</strong> TST (and Arrhenius theory) is that<br />

the upper limit for the 298 K rate constant <strong>of</strong> a unimolecular reaction that takes place with<br />

zero activation energy (<strong>of</strong> whatever sort) is roughly 10 13 sec −1 . This is, in some sense, a<br />

conceptually obvious result since that is on the order <strong>of</strong> a molecular vibrational frequency,<br />

which is thought <strong>of</strong> as the ‘mechanism’ by which a transition state goes to its products.<br />

15.3.1.2 Kinetic isotope effects<br />

As noted in Chapter 10, the zero-point energy, and the translational, rotational, and vibrational<br />

partition functions all depend on the isotopic masses <strong>of</strong> the atoms. Thus, so too does<br />

the rate constant for a given reaction. A difference in rates observed for two different isotopically<br />

substituted reactants is referred to as a kinetic isotope effect (KIE), usually expressed<br />

as a ratio <strong>of</strong> rates. Isotope effects are divided into two classes: primary isotope effects refer<br />

to situations where the isotopic substitution involves one <strong>of</strong> the two atoms involved in a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!