07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

414 11 IMPLICIT MODELS FOR CONDENSED PHASES<br />

A +• (gas) + e – (gas)<br />

A +• (sol) + e – (gas)<br />

∆G o (gas)<br />

A (gas)<br />

A (sol)<br />

A (gas) + e – (gas)<br />

A (sol) + e – (gas)<br />

∆G o (gas)<br />

A –• (gas)<br />

∆Go S(A +• ) ∆Go S(A –• ∆G )<br />

o ∆G S(A)<br />

o ∆G S(A)<br />

o = 0 ∆Go = 0<br />

∆G o (sol)<br />

∆G o (sol)<br />

A –• (sol)<br />

Figure 11.10 Thermodynamic cycles for one-electron oxidation (left) and reduction (right) potentials<br />

in solution<br />

thermodynamic cycles perforce involve open-shell species and free electrons. Note that<br />

the oxidation and reduction cycles in the gas phase correspond conceptually to ionization<br />

potentials and electron affinities, respectively, except that IPs and EAs are enthalpies, not<br />

free energies, so thermal and entropic terms must be included therein. For the free electron,<br />

like the free proton, the electronic energy is zero, but the sum <strong>of</strong> the PV and translational<br />

terms leads to a total gas-phase free energy at 298 K and 1 atm <strong>of</strong> −0.00001 a.u. (it is<br />

a coincidence that for this standard state the free energy associated with the translational<br />

entropy almost exactly cancels the enthalpy).<br />

Another key feature <strong>of</strong> redox thermodynamic cycles is that the free energy change in<br />

solution is still defined to involve a gas-phase electron, that is, the solvation free energy <strong>of</strong><br />

the electron is happily not an issue. And, once again, redox potentials in solution typically<br />

assume 1 M standard states for all species (but not always; in this chapter’s case study, for<br />

instance, all redox potentials were measured and computed for chloride ion concentrations<br />

buffered to 0.001 M). So, free energy changes associated with concentration adjustments<br />

must also be properly taken into account.<br />

Once the free energy change in solution has been computed, the absolute redox potential<br />

Eo may be computed as<br />

E o =− Go<br />

(11.29)<br />

nF<br />

where n is the number <strong>of</strong> electrons transferred and F is the Faraday constant equal to<br />

23.061 kcal mol −1 V −1 . Note that while Figure 11.10 presents thermodynamic cycles for<br />

one-electron processes, analogous cycles involving multiple electrons are readily constructed<br />

and may sometimes be more amenable to experimental determination.<br />

In practice, experimental redox potentials are reported relative to a standard electrode. If<br />

the standard is the NHE, one subtracts 4.36 V from the absolute reduction potential (the ‘cost’<br />

<strong>of</strong> the free electron) or adds 4.36 V to the absolute oxidation potential (the ‘return’ from the<br />

removed electron) in order to determine the relative potential. Adjustment to other standard<br />

electrodes is straightforward, since their potentials relative to the NHE are well known.<br />

With respect to accuracy, it is again important to employ basis sets including diffuse<br />

functions when anions are present as either reactants or products. With large well balanced<br />

basis sets, B3LYP for gas-phase energetics, and a PB SCRF solvation model, Baik and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!