07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

216 7 INCLUDING ELECTRON CORRELATION IN MO THEORY<br />

double excitations using perturbation theory (Head-Gordon et al. 1994; Section 7.4 presents<br />

the basics <strong>of</strong> perturbation theory); this model is referred to as SF-CIS(D). Preliminary studies<br />

on various challenging problems like homolytic bond dissociation energies and singlet–triplet<br />

energy separations in biradicals have shown SF-CISD and SF-CIS(D) to be considerably<br />

more robust than the corresponding non-spin-flip approaches (Krylov 2001; Krylov and<br />

Sherrill 2002; Slipchenko and Krylov 2002).<br />

7.3.2 Multireference<br />

The formalism for multireference configuration interaction (MRCI) is quite similar to that<br />

for single-reference CI, except that instead <strong>of</strong> the HF wave function serving as reference,<br />

an MCSCF wave function is used. While it is computationally considerably more difficult<br />

to construct the initial MCSCF wave function than a HF wave function, the significant<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> the virtual orbitals in the former case can make the CI itself more rapidly<br />

convergent. Nevertheless, the number <strong>of</strong> matrix elements requiring evaluation in MRCI<br />

calculations is enormous, and they are usually undertaken only for small systems. Typically,<br />

MRCI is a useful method to study a large section <strong>of</strong> a PES, where significant changes in<br />

bonding (and thus correlation energy) are taking place so a sophisticated method is needed<br />

to accurately predict dynamical and non-dynamical correlation energies.<br />

As with single-reference CI, most MRCI calculations truncate the CI expansion to include<br />

only singles and doubles (MRCISD). An analog <strong>of</strong> Eq. (7.18) has been proposed to make<br />

up for the non-size-extensivity this engenders (Bruna, Peyerimh<strong>of</strong>f, and Buenker, 1980).<br />

MRCISD calculations with large basis sets can be better than similarly expensive full CI<br />

calculations with smaller basis sets, illustrating that most <strong>of</strong> the correlation energy can be<br />

captured by including only limited excitations, at least in those systems small enough to<br />

permit thorough evaluation. Additional efficiencies can be gained by restricting the size <strong>of</strong><br />

the MCSCF reference to something smaller than a CAS reference and considering only the<br />

reduced number <strong>of</strong> single and double excitations therefrom (Pitarch-Ruiz, Sanchez-Marin,<br />

and Maynau 2002).<br />

7.4 Perturbation Theory<br />

7.4.1 General Principles<br />

Often in pseudoeigenvalue equations, the nature <strong>of</strong> a particular operator makes it difficult<br />

to work with. However, it is sometimes worthwhile to create a more tractable operator by<br />

removing some particularly unpleasant portion <strong>of</strong> the original one. Using exact eigenfunctions<br />

and eigenvalues <strong>of</strong> the simplified operator, it is possible to estimate the eigenfunctions<br />

and eigenvalues <strong>of</strong> the more complete operator. Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory<br />

provides a prescription for accomplishing this.<br />

In the general case, we have some operator A that we can write as<br />

A = A (0) + λV (7.19)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!