07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

188 6 AB INITIO HARTREE–FOCK MO THEORY<br />

is to be preserved. Typically the difference in energy between these two possible configurations<br />

is so large that no reasonable means for guessing the initial wave function generates<br />

the higher energy possibility. This is one <strong>of</strong> the advantages <strong>of</strong> closed-shell states compared<br />

to open-shell ones. Certain other aspects <strong>of</strong> dealing with open-shell systems also merit<br />

attention.<br />

6.3.3 Open-shell Systems<br />

The presentation <strong>of</strong> the HF equations in Chapter 4 assumed a closed-shell singlet for simplicity,<br />

but what if there are one or more singly occupied orbitals? Let us proceed with an<br />

example to guide the discussion, in this case, the methyl radical, which is planar in its<br />

equilibrium structure (Figure 6.10). The most intuitive description <strong>of</strong> the wave function for<br />

this system (ignoring symmetry for ease <strong>of</strong> discussion) would be<br />

<br />

2<br />

= C1s 2 σ 2 CHaσ 2 CHbσ 2 CHcC2p1 <br />

z<br />

(6.6)<br />

Thus, there is a doubly occupied carbon 1s core, three C–H bonding orbitals, and the<br />

unpaired electron in a carbon 2p orbital. Given this configuration, it might seem natural to<br />

envision an extension <strong>of</strong> HF theory where all <strong>of</strong> the orbitals continue to be evaluated using<br />

essentially the restricted formalism (RHF) for closed-shell systems, but the density matrix<br />

elements for the singly occupied orbital(s) are not multiplied by the factor <strong>of</strong> two appearing<br />

in Eq. (4.57). In essence, this describes so-called restricted open-shell HF theory (ROHF).<br />

In its completely general form, certain complications arise for systems whose descriptions<br />

require more than a single determinant (i.e., unlike Eq. (6.6)), so we will not extend this<br />

qualitative description <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> the theory to specific equations (such details are<br />

available in Veillard (1975)). It suffices to note that most electronic structure packages <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

ROHF as an option for open-shell calculations.<br />

Besides being intuitively satisfying, ROHF theory produces wave functions that are eigenfunctions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the operator S 2 (just as the true wave function must be), having eigenvalues<br />

S(S + 1) where S is the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the vector sum <strong>of</strong> the spin magnetic moments for all<br />

<strong>of</strong> the unpaired electrons. However, ROHF theory fails to account for spin polarization in<br />

H<br />

H<br />

C H<br />

ROHF UHF<br />

Figure 6.10 In the absence <strong>of</strong> spin polarization, which corresponds to the ROHF picture, there is zero<br />

spin density in the plane containing the atoms <strong>of</strong> the methyl radical. Accounting for spin polarization,<br />

which corresponds to the UHF picture, results in a build-up <strong>of</strong> negative spin density (represented as a<br />

shaded region) in the same plane<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!