07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11.3 CONTINUUM MODELS FOR NON-ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTIONS 409<br />

The surface tensions themselves in the GB/SA and MST-ST models were developed by<br />

taking collections <strong>of</strong> experimental data for the free energy <strong>of</strong> solvation in a specific solvent,<br />

removing the electrostatic component as calculated by the GB or MST model, and fitting<br />

the surface tensions to best reproduce the residual free energy given the known SASA <strong>of</strong> the<br />

solute atoms. Such a multilinear regression procedure requires a reasonably sized collection<br />

<strong>of</strong> data to be statistically robust, and limitations in data have thus restricted these models to<br />

water, carbon tetrachloride, chlor<strong>of</strong>orm, and octanol as solvents.<br />

In order to be more generally applicable, the SMx models <strong>of</strong> Cramer and Truhlar address<br />

the issue <strong>of</strong> data scarcity by making the atomic surface tensions a function <strong>of</strong> quantifiable<br />

solvent properties, i.e.,<br />

σk = <br />

j<br />

Ɣjη Ɣj<br />

k<br />

(11.23)<br />

where j runs over the property list, Ɣ is the value <strong>of</strong> a particular property in convenient units,<br />

and the quantities η Ɣj<br />

k become the parameters needing to be fit by multilinear regression.<br />

Although this introduces multiple parameters per atom type k, it permits regression over a<br />

single data set containing solvation free energies into any solvent, so long as its required<br />

solvent properties are known. In the SM5 versions <strong>of</strong> the models, the macroscopic solvent<br />

properties include surface tension, index <strong>of</strong> refraction, hydrogen bonding acidity and basicity,<br />

and percent composition <strong>of</strong> aromatic carbon atoms and electronegative halogen atoms, and<br />

the parameterization set involves more than 2500 data in 91 different solvents (Li et al.<br />

1999).<br />

A separate flexibility built into the SMx models compared to most other QM continuum<br />

models augmented with surface tensions is that no assignment <strong>of</strong> atom type need be made.<br />

Instead, the SMx surface tensions are functions <strong>of</strong> local geometry, so that, for instance, a<br />

carbon-bound hydrogen atom is distinguished from an oxygen-bound hydrogen atom and<br />

assigned a different surface tension to reflect its different character. The surface tension<br />

functions are smooth and differentiable, which facilitates their use in modeling situations<br />

where an atom may change from one type to another along a reaction coordinate, for instance.<br />

Surface-tension augmented continuum models permit the computation <strong>of</strong> full free energies<br />

<strong>of</strong> solvation and may thus be used to construct solvated potential energy surfaces in the spirit<br />

<strong>of</strong> Figure 11.1. Ins<strong>of</strong>ar as the solvation free energy itself and any equilibrium or kinetic<br />

quantities computed for the solvated PES are physical observables, the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

solvation models may be assessed by comparison to experimental data. We consider several<br />

such comparisons in the next section in addition to addressing certain important technical<br />

details. Prior to doing so, however, it must be mentioned that the use <strong>of</strong> atomic surface<br />

tensions has been carried to the extreme <strong>of</strong> assuming that they can account for the entire<br />

solvation free energy, i.e., the electrostatics are completely implicit and the parameters in<br />

Eq. (11.23) are fit to the full solvation free energy (recent examples include Hawkins et al.<br />

1998, Wang et al. 2001, and Hou et al. 2002). Such models are typically designed for use<br />

with biopolymers, where there is a need for extreme efficiency and the range <strong>of</strong> atom types<br />

is rather limited. An approach that is similar in its conceptual simplicity, albeit not entirely<br />

devoid <strong>of</strong> electrostatics, is the solvation free energy density (SFED) approach <strong>of</strong> No et al.<br />

(1999) where the full free energy <strong>of</strong> solvation is computed from the accessible volume (as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!