07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Known Typographical and Other Errors<br />

Known Typographical and Other Errors in All Editions<br />

(as <strong>of</strong> September 7, 2005)<br />

Page/line/equation numbering refers to the 2nd edition {1st edition in curly braces if the material<br />

appeared in the 1st edition}. If you find errors other than those listed below, do please send them to<br />

the author (i.e., me)<br />

Page Error<br />

68<br />

{61}<br />

83<br />

{77}<br />

168<br />

{156}<br />

217<br />

{205}<br />

229<br />

{215}<br />

The following reference is missing: Luo, F., McBane, G. C.,<br />

Kim, G., Giese, C. F., and Gentry, W. R. 1993. J. Chem.<br />

Phys., 98, 3564.<br />

In Eqs. (3.35) to (3.37) the dipole moment should be qr, not<br />

q/r<br />

The caption to Figure 6.1 should begin: "Behavior <strong>of</strong> ex<br />

..." (i.e., not e x )<br />

Eq. (7.24). The eigenvalue "a" on the r.h.s. should have a<br />

subscript zero to indicate the ground state.<br />

Lines 3 to 6 {17 to 20}. Two sentences should be changed to<br />

read: Thus, if we apply this formula to going from an (s,p,d)<br />

saturated basis set to an (s,p,d,f) basis set, our error drops by<br />

64%, i.e., we recover a little less than two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the missing<br />

correlation energy. Going from (s,p,d,f) to (s,p,d,f,g), the<br />

improvement drops to 53%, or, compared to the (s,p,d) starting<br />

point, about five-sixths <strong>of</strong> the original error.<br />

298 In the reference in Table 8.7 for the PW91 correlation<br />

functional, the editor's name is "Eschrig" not "Eschig".<br />

311 Eq. (9.10). The "min" function on the r.h.s. should be "max".<br />

314<br />

{282}<br />

330<br />

{295}<br />

359<br />

{323}<br />

509<br />

{461}<br />

525<br />

{477}<br />

Eq. (9.17) {Eq. (9.11)}. The last line should sum over the<br />

orthogonalized functions, chi-subscript-s, not chi-subscript-r.<br />

The equation is also somewhat more clear if the order <strong>of</strong> the<br />

"c" and "S 1/2 " terms in the sum are reversed.<br />

Line 9. Reference should be made to Section 8.5.5 (not 8.5.6).<br />

Eq. (10.9). Both the last term on the second line <strong>of</strong> the<br />

equation and the first term on the fifth line <strong>of</strong> the equation<br />

should be subscripted "rot" not "elec".<br />

In the line below Eq. (14.28), the words "expectation value"<br />

should be replaced by "overlap integral".<br />

Eq. (15.17). The r.h.s. should have "-" instead <strong>of</strong> "+" before<br />

the term k B TlnQ.<br />

http://pollux.chem.umn.edu/~cramer/Errors2.html<br />

Página 1 de 2<br />

09/01/2006

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!