07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

324 9 CHARGE DISTRIBUTION AND SPECTROSCOPIC PROPERTIES<br />

to be one <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> possible types, and a fixed correction determined from<br />

having fit these parameters on a 2700-molecule test set <strong>of</strong> HF/6-31G(d) ESP charges is<br />

applied. While this protocol is robust for most molecules, it cannot be readily applied to<br />

structures not characterized by standard bonding, like transition states or structures along a<br />

reaction pathway.<br />

9.1.4 Total Spin<br />

Well-behaved wave functions are eigenfunctions <strong>of</strong> the total spin operator S 2 , having eigenvalues<br />

<strong>of</strong> s(s + 1), where the quantum number s is 0 for a singlet, 1/2 for a doublet, 1 for<br />

a triplet, etc. One sometimes sees it written that s is equal to the sum <strong>of</strong> the sz values for<br />

all <strong>of</strong> the electrons, where sz is the expectation value <strong>of</strong> the corresponding operator Sz (spin<br />

angular momentum along the z coordinate) and takes on values in a.u. <strong>of</strong> +1/2 for an α<br />

electron and −1/2 foraβ electron. This is incorrect, however. In fact, s is equal to the<br />

magnitude <strong>of</strong> the vector sum <strong>of</strong> the individual electronic angular momenta, and thus s can<br />

take on values according to<br />

s = |nα − nβ |<br />

,<br />

2<br />

|nα − nβ |<br />

+ 1,...,<br />

2<br />

nα + nβ 2<br />

(9.29)<br />

where n ξ is the number <strong>of</strong> unpaired electrons <strong>of</strong> spin ξ. Thus, for instance, a system having<br />

an α and a β electron that are not paired with one another in the same MO can be either a<br />

singlet or a triplet (the so-called Sz = 0 triplet), reflecting the ability <strong>of</strong> s to take on values<br />

<strong>of</strong> either 0 or 1.<br />

As described in more detail in Appendix C, the Sz = 0 triplet cannot be expressed as a<br />

single determinant over spin orbitals, so it cannot be represented in HF or KS theory. Of<br />

course, this is not usually a concern, since it is trivial to construct one <strong>of</strong> the other two<br />

degenerate representations <strong>of</strong> the triplet state (having an excess <strong>of</strong> either two α or two β<br />

electrons), and these can be approximated as single-determinantal wave functions, so we<br />

work with them instead. The point, however, is that one cannot arbitrarily sum together<br />

the sz eigenvalues for all the unpaired electrons in a single determinant and assign to that<br />

determinant a unique spin state with s equal to the sum. Unless all <strong>of</strong> the unpaired electrons<br />

have the same spin (in which case inspection <strong>of</strong> Eq. (9.29) indicates that s can only take on<br />

one value), a single determinant is usually a mixture <strong>of</strong> states, and any properties determined<br />

as expectation values over that determinant reflect this mixing.<br />

In UHF theory, the expectation value <strong>of</strong> the total spin operator over the singledeterminantal<br />

UHF wave function is computed as<br />

〈S 2 〉=<br />

α β α β |N − N | |N − N |<br />

2<br />

2<br />

<br />

+ 1 + min{N α ,N β αocc. βocc. <br />

}− 〈φ α i |φβ j 〉 (9.30)<br />

i=1 j=1<br />

where N ξ is the total number <strong>of</strong> electrons <strong>of</strong> spin ξ and the φ ξ are the UHF MOs for spin<br />

ξ. Note that if all <strong>of</strong> the ‘doubly’ occupied orbitals are identical in shape for the α and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!