07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

378 10 THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES<br />

where {A} emphasizes computation over the population <strong>of</strong> all conformers <strong>of</strong> A (where this<br />

set can include structures differing only by atom labeling, as detailed further in Appendix<br />

B). Free-energy changes, then, between two species each <strong>of</strong> which exist as populations over<br />

multiple conformers, must be computed as the difference between their averages. Note that<br />

the formalism <strong>of</strong> Eq. (10.50) may also be applied to determine averaged transition state free<br />

energies provided multiple transition state structures exist all <strong>of</strong> which lead to the same<br />

product; the difference between an averaged reactant free energy and an averaged transition<br />

state free energy defines a free energy <strong>of</strong> activation.<br />

In fortunate instances, one conformer in a population has a free energy that is much lower<br />

than that <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the other possibilities. Inspection <strong>of</strong> Eq. (10.50) makes clear that in that<br />

instance, only the low-energy term contributes significantly to the sum, in which case that<br />

free energy may be taken as the population free energy.<br />

10.5.4 Standard-state Conversions<br />

Two issues associated with thermodynamic standard states bear some further attention. The<br />

first is associated with the enthalpy <strong>of</strong> ions. Ion heats <strong>of</strong> formation may be defined based on<br />

the heats <strong>of</strong> ionization <strong>of</strong> neutral molecules (or electron attachments thereto). For example,<br />

one might consider a reaction like<br />

A −−−→ A +ž + e −<br />

(10.51)<br />

and define the heat <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> the radical cation A +ž as the sum <strong>of</strong> the heat <strong>of</strong> formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> A and the enthalpy change for Eq. (10.51). In that case, however, one needs to assign a<br />

heat <strong>of</strong> formation to the free electron. The thermal electron convention takes the free electron<br />

as the ‘electron standard state’, i.e., its enthalpy <strong>of</strong> formation is always zero. The so-called<br />

ion convention, on the other hand, takes the electron at rest to be the standard state (this is<br />

the usual theoretical convention as well, recall), and predominates in the mass spectrometric<br />

literature. The conversion between the two is straightforward, namely<br />

H o<br />

f,T (Xq ) = H o′<br />

f,T (Xq ) + 5<br />

qRT (10.52)<br />

where superscript ‘o’ represents the thermal electron standard state, superscript ‘o ′ ’represents<br />

the ion convention standard state, and q is the signed charge on X.<br />

A separate issue arises in the discussion <strong>of</strong> standard-state free energies. Recall that the<br />

entropy <strong>of</strong> translation requires a concentration specification to be included as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

standard-state conditions. Different tabulations <strong>of</strong> data <strong>of</strong>ten adopt different concentration<br />

conventions, and it is very important that care be taken to ensure consistent comparisons.<br />

To convert from one convention to another, we write<br />

G o′<br />

= G o <br />

o Q<br />

+ RT ln<br />

′ <br />

(10.53)<br />

2<br />

Q o

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!