07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

520 15 ADIABATIC REACTION DYNAMICS<br />

15.1.1 Unimolecular Reactions<br />

The simplest unimolecular reaction may be expressed in equilibrium form as<br />

A k1<br />

−−−⇀ ↽−−− B (15.3)<br />

k−1<br />

where A and B are isomeric, e.g., conformationally or constitutionally. The unimolecular<br />

rate constants above and below the equilibrium arrows are associated with the forward and<br />

reverse steps in the equilibrium process. Thus, the rate at which A is converted into B is<br />

k1[A] while the rate at which B is converted into A is k−1[B]. These rate constants truly are<br />

‘constants’, i.e., they are independent <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

Note that at equilibrium, the rate at which A is converted into B must be exactly equal to<br />

the rate at which B is converted into A, i.e., the system is stationary with respect to reactant<br />

and product concentrations. Thus<br />

This may be rearranged to yield<br />

k1[A]eq = k−1[B]eq<br />

k1<br />

= [B]eq<br />

[A]eq<br />

k−1<br />

= Keq<br />

(15.4)<br />

(15.5)<br />

where Keq is the equilibrium constant for Eq. (15.3). So, it is a straightforward task to<br />

measure the ratio <strong>of</strong> the elementary rate constants, but how is any one measured individually?<br />

If we consider the system perturbed from equilibrium – let us suppose that there is an<br />

excess <strong>of</strong> A – then the rate <strong>of</strong> return to equilibrium may be expressed either as the rate <strong>of</strong><br />

disappearance <strong>of</strong> A, i.e., −d[A]/dt, or as the rate <strong>of</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> B, i.e., d[B]/dt. Using<br />

the first choice, we may write<br />

− d[A]<br />

dt = k1[A] − k−1[B] (15.6)<br />

If the second term on the r.h.s. can be ignored, either because k−1 ≪ k1 (a so-called ‘irreversible’<br />

reaction), or because we start with [A] ≫ [B] and only observe the system over a<br />

time frame where that relationship continues to hold, then we may rearrange Eq. (15.6) to<br />

give the first-order rate expression<br />

− d[A]<br />

[A] = k1dt (15.7)<br />

where ‘first order’ implies that the sum <strong>of</strong> the exponents for concentration terms on the r.h.s.<br />

<strong>of</strong> the general rate expression written in the form <strong>of</strong> Eq. (15.2) is one. Integration <strong>of</strong> both

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!