07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

412 11 IMPLICIT MODELS FOR CONDENSED PHASES<br />

AH n (gas)<br />

AH n (sol)<br />

∆G o (gas)<br />

∆G o (sol)<br />

A n –1 (gas) + H + (gas)<br />

∆G o S(AH n ) ∆G o S(A n–1 ) ∆G o S(H + )<br />

A n –1 (sol) + H + (sol)<br />

Figure 11.9 Free energy cycle for computation <strong>of</strong> pKa values (where n is an integer). This cycle is<br />

sometimes referred to as a Born–Haber cycle<br />

potentials. Computation <strong>of</strong> the former is accomplished by employing the free-energy cycle<br />

depicted in Figure 11.9. Thus, gas-phase free energies <strong>of</strong> AHn and An−1 may be computed<br />

at arbitrarily high levels <strong>of</strong> theory to establish as accurately as possible the deprotonation<br />

free energy <strong>of</strong> AHn . Note that if n and/or n − 1 are negative numbers then the basis set will<br />

need to include diffuse functions in order to obtain even modest quantitative accuracy. As<br />

for the proton, its electronic energy is obviously zero, and its gas-phase free energy derives<br />

entirely from a PV enthalpy term and a translational free energy that may be computed from<br />

Eqs. (10.16) and (10.17). At 298 K in the usual 1 atm standard state the free energy <strong>of</strong> the<br />

proton is −0.00999 a.u.<br />

To compute the deprotonation free energy in solution, we take the gas-phase free energy<br />

change, add the free energies <strong>of</strong> solvation <strong>of</strong> An−1 and H + (see above for the latter), and<br />

subtract the free energy <strong>of</strong> solvation <strong>of</strong> AHn . However, note that most continuum solvation<br />

models compute the free energy <strong>of</strong> solvation assuming the same standard-state concentration<br />

in the gas phase as in solution. As most pKa values adopt a standard-state concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1 M, we need then to compute the free energy change associated with adjusting the<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the gas-phase species from 1 mol per 24.5 L (the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

an ideal gas at 1 atm pressure and 298 K) to 1 mol per 1 L. As described in Section 10.5.4,<br />

this change is RT ln(24.5) for every species. As there are two products and only one reactant<br />

in the deprotonation reaction, the net effect is to make deprotonation less favorable by<br />

1.9 kcal mol−1 in the 1 M standard state compared to the 1 atm standard state at 298 K.<br />

Having computed the free-energy change in solution by this protocol, we may then<br />

compute Ka as<br />

and pKa as<br />

Ka = e −Go<br />

(sol) /RT<br />

<br />

pKa =−log e −Go<br />

<br />

/RT (sol)<br />

(11.24)<br />

(11.25)<br />

As errors in ionic solvation free energies are <strong>of</strong>ten on the order <strong>of</strong> 5 kcal mol −1 ,andas<br />

errors in the gas-phase deprotonation free energies may be <strong>of</strong> similar magnitude even with<br />

reasonably good levels <strong>of</strong> theory, errors in predicted absolute pKa values <strong>of</strong> 5 or more pK<br />

units are not terribly unusual, which is not particularly satisfying ins<strong>of</strong>ar as experimental<br />

measurements can be accurate to 0.01 pK units.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!