07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

394 11 IMPLICIT MODELS FOR CONDENSED PHASES<br />

explicitly, we replace it by a continuous electric field that represents a statistical average<br />

over all solvent degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom at thermal equilibrium. This field is usually called the<br />

‘reaction field’ in the regions <strong>of</strong> space occupied by the solute, since it derives from reaction<br />

<strong>of</strong> the solvent to the presence <strong>of</strong> the solute. The electric field at a given point in space is<br />

the gradient <strong>of</strong> the electrostatic potential φ at that point, and the work required to create the<br />

charge distribution may be determined from the interaction <strong>of</strong> the solute charge density ρ<br />

with the electrostatic potential according to<br />

G =− 1<br />

<br />

ρ (r)φ (r) dr (11.3)<br />

2<br />

The charge density ρ <strong>of</strong> the solute may be expressed either as some continuous function<br />

<strong>of</strong> r or as discrete point charges, depending on the theoretical model used to represent the<br />

solute. The polarization energy, GP, discussed above, is simply the difference in the work<br />

<strong>of</strong> charging the system in the gas phase and in solution. Thus, in order to compute the<br />

polarization free energy, all that is needed is the electrostatic potential in solution and in the<br />

gas phase (the latter may be regarded as a dielectric medium characterized by a dielectric<br />

constant <strong>of</strong> 1).<br />

11.2.1 The Poisson Equation<br />

At the heart <strong>of</strong> all continuum solvent models is a reliance on the Poisson equation <strong>of</strong> classical<br />

electrostatics to express the electrostatic potential as a function <strong>of</strong> the charge density and the<br />

dielectric constant. The Poisson equation, valid for situations where a surrounding dielectric<br />

medium responds in a linear fashion to the embedding <strong>of</strong> charge, is written<br />

∇ 2 4πρ (r)<br />

φ (r) =−<br />

ε<br />

(11.4)<br />

where ε is the dielectric constant <strong>of</strong> the medium. Ins<strong>of</strong>ar as continuum solvation involves<br />

representing the solute explicitly and the solvent implicitly, the charge distribution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

solute is thought <strong>of</strong> as being inside a cavity that displaces an otherwise homogeneous dielectric<br />

medium. Thus, there are really two regions, one inside and one outside the cavity, in<br />

which case the Poisson equation is properly written as<br />

∇ε (r) ·∇φ (r) =−4πρ (r) (11.5)<br />

The Poisson equation is valid under conditions <strong>of</strong> zero ionic strength. If dissolved, mobile<br />

electrolytes are present in the solvent, the Poisson–Boltzmann (PB) equation applies instead<br />

2 kBT<br />

∇ε (r) ·∇φ (r) − ε (r) λ (r) κ<br />

q sinh<br />

<br />

qφ (r)<br />

=−4πρ (r) (11.6)<br />

kBT<br />

where q is the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the charge <strong>of</strong> the electrolyte ions, λ is a simple switching<br />

function which is zero in regions inaccessible to the electrolyte and one otherwise, and κ 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!