07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

374 10 THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES<br />

generally not isogyric, and this is an important factor in the large change in correlation<br />

energy associated with atomization.<br />

Note that the above discussion can be rephrased in a very transparent way: a good<br />

isodesmic equation should predict a near-zero heat <strong>of</strong> reaction. The larger the predicted<br />

change in enthalpy, the greater the chance that lower levels <strong>of</strong> theory will fail to accurately<br />

account for energetic differences between dissimilar bonds. Note that just because a reaction<br />

does predict an overall enthalpy change near zero does not necessarily imply that the bonds<br />

on both sides are similar – large changes in one type may be <strong>of</strong>fset by similarly large<br />

changes in another type – thus a near-zero heat <strong>of</strong> reaction is a necessary but not sufficient<br />

condition for an ideal isodesmic equation (for a mathematically more sophisticated approach<br />

to employing various isodesmic reactions, see Fishtik, Datta, and Liebman 2003).<br />

These points are illustrated in more detail for the case <strong>of</strong> singlet p-benzyne, which has<br />

already been the subject <strong>of</strong> some discussion in preceding chapters. Consider the following<br />

three isodesmic reactions that might be used to determine its heat <strong>of</strong> formation:<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

+<br />

2 CH 4 +<br />

H<br />

H<br />

•<br />

H<br />

H H<br />

H<br />

H H<br />

H<br />

•<br />

•<br />

H<br />

H H<br />

H<br />

+<br />

•<br />

H<br />

•<br />

H H<br />

•<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H H + (10.41)<br />

•<br />

2 CH 3 +<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

H H<br />

H<br />

H<br />

•<br />

H<br />

H H<br />

H<br />

(10.42)<br />

2 (10.43)<br />

The issue <strong>of</strong> isogyricity is a bit tricky in this instance, since p-benzyne is a ground-state<br />

singlet, but the coupling between the highest energy pair <strong>of</strong> electrons is very small. Table 10.3<br />

indicates the heats <strong>of</strong> reaction computed for each <strong>of</strong> Eqs. (10.41)–(10.43) and the heats <strong>of</strong><br />

formation determined for p-benzyne (using Eq. (10.37) and the experimentally available data<br />

for the methyl radical, methane, acetylene, ethylene, the phenyl radical, and benzene) at the<br />

CASPT2 and CCSD(T) levels; in each case, the equivalent <strong>of</strong> a basis set roughly triple-ζ<br />

in quality was used. Note that Eq. (10.43) is predicted to be the most nearly thermoneutral<br />

(which seems intuitively reasonable) and using it both levels <strong>of</strong> theory make predictions<br />

within the experimental error for H o<br />

f,298 (p-benzyne). Equation (10.41) is predicted to be<br />

highly exothermic, because the r.h.s. has an extra π bond in acetylene compared to ethylene,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!