07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.5 BASIC NDDO FORMALISM 143<br />

error for ionization potentials was 0.7 eV (46 molecules), for heavy-atom bond lengths<br />

0.022 ˚A (81 molecules), and for dipole moments 0.45 D (31 molecules). While mean errors<br />

<strong>of</strong> this size exceed what would be tolerated today, they were unprecedentedly small in 1975.<br />

Dewar’s subsequent work on other semiempirical models (see below) rendered MINDO/3<br />

effectively obsolete, but its historical importance remains unchanged.<br />

A modified INDO model that is not entirely obsolete is the symmetric orthogonalized<br />

INDO (SINDO1) model <strong>of</strong> Jug and co-workers, first described in 1980 (Nanda and<br />

Jug 1980). The various conventions employed by SINDO1 represent slightly different modifications<br />

to INDO theory than those adopted in the MINDO/3 model, but the more fundamental<br />

difference is the inclusion <strong>of</strong> d functions for atoms <strong>of</strong> the second row in the periodic table.<br />

Inclusion <strong>of</strong> such functions in the atomic valence basis set proves critical for handling hypervalent<br />

molecules containing these atoms, and thus SINDO1 performs considerably better for<br />

phosphorus-containing compounds, for instance, than do other semiempirical models that<br />

lack d functions (Jug and Schulz 1988).<br />

5.5 Basic NDDO Formalism<br />

The INDO model extends the CNDO model by adding flexibility to the description <strong>of</strong> the<br />

one-center two-electron integrals. In INDO, however, there continues to be only a single<br />

two-center two-electron integral, which takes on the value γAB irrespective <strong>of</strong> which orbitals<br />

on atoms A and B are considered. As already noted, this can play havoc with the accurate<br />

representation <strong>of</strong> lone pair interactions.<br />

The neglect <strong>of</strong> diatomic differential overlap (NDDO) method relaxes the constraints on<br />

two-center two-electron integrals in a fashion analogous to that for one-center integrals in<br />

the INDO method. Thus, all integrals (µν|λσ ) are retained provided µ and ν are on the<br />

same atomic center and λ and σ are on the same atomic center, but not necessarily the<br />

center hosting µ and ν. How many different integrals are permitted? The order <strong>of</strong> µ and<br />

ν does not affect the value <strong>of</strong> the integral, so we need only worry about combinations, not<br />

permutations, in which case there are 10 unique combinations <strong>of</strong> s, p x ,p y ,andp z . With<br />

10 unique combinations on each atom, there are 100 possible combinations <strong>of</strong> combinations<br />

for the integrals. If we include d functions, the number <strong>of</strong> unique integrals increases to 2025.<br />

Although these numbers seem large, this is still a considerable improvement over evaluating<br />

every possible integral, as would be undertaken in ab initio HF theory. Most modern<br />

semiempirical models are NDDO models. After examining the differences in their formulation,<br />

we will examine their performance characteristics in some detail in Section 5.6.<br />

5.5.1 MNDO<br />

Dewar and Thiel (1977) reported a modified neglect <strong>of</strong> differential overlap (MNDO) method<br />

based on the NDDO formalism for the elements C, H, O, and N. With the conventions<br />

specified by NDDO for which integrals to keep, which to discard, and how to model oneelectron<br />

integrals, it is possible to write the NDDO Fock matrix elements individually for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!