07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

366 10 THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES<br />

the less tractable vibrational partition functions restrict this choice to only the most ambitious<br />

<strong>of</strong> calculations.)<br />

In practice, then, it is fairly straightforward to convert the potential energy determined from<br />

an electronic structure calculation into a wealth <strong>of</strong> thermodynamic data – all that is required<br />

is an optimized structure with its associated vibrational frequencies. Given the many levels<br />

<strong>of</strong> electronic structure theory for which analytic second derivatives are available, it is usually<br />

worth the effort required to compute the frequencies and then the thermodynamic variables,<br />

especially since experimental data are typically measured in this form. For one such quantity,<br />

the absolute entropy So , which is computed as the sum <strong>of</strong> Eqs. (10.13), (10.18), (10.24) (for<br />

non-linear molecules), and (10.30), theory and experiment are directly comparable. Hout,<br />

Levi, and Hehre (1982) computed absolute entropies at 300 K for a large number <strong>of</strong> small<br />

molecules at the MP2/6-31G(d) level and obtained agreement with experiment within 0.1 e.u.<br />

for many cases. Absolute heat capacities at constant volume can also be computed using the<br />

thermodynamic definition<br />

<br />

∂U<br />

CV =<br />

(10.31)<br />

∂T V<br />

and the various equations for components <strong>of</strong> U above.<br />

Absolute internal energies, enthalpies, and free energies, on the other hand, are somewhat<br />

less straightforward. From a theoretical standpoint, using the electronic energy as something<br />

to which thermodynamic components are added is equivalent to setting the absolute zero<br />

<strong>of</strong> energy as corresponding to all nuclei and electrons infinitely separated one from another<br />

and at rest. In the laboratory, this is a very inconvenient zero, since the relevant elementary<br />

particles are not easily handled. The alternative conventions in common use for reporting<br />

H and G as determined from experiment, and the steps which must be taken so that theory<br />

and experiment may be consistently compared, are addressed next.<br />

10.4 Standard-state Heats and Free Energies <strong>of</strong> Formation<br />

and Reaction<br />

The experimental convention for assigning a zero to an enthalpy or free-energy scale is<br />

that this is the value that corresponds to the heat or free energy <strong>of</strong> formation associated<br />

with every element in its most stable, pure form under standard conditions (273 K, 1 atm).<br />

Thus, for instance, the elemental standard states for the first few elements are hydrogen<br />

gas (diatomic), helium gas (monatomic), solid lithium, solid beryllium, solid boron, solid<br />

carbon as its graphite allostere, nitrogen gas (diatomic), oxygen gas (diatomic), fluorine<br />

gas (diatomic), and neon gas (monatomic). Following this convention, the meaning <strong>of</strong> an<br />

experimental heat <strong>of</strong> formation for a molecule is that it is the (molar) enthalpy change<br />

associated with removing each <strong>of</strong> the atoms in the molecule from its elemental standard<br />

state and assembling them into the molecule.<br />

Put in this manner, it is easy to imagine this as a two-step procedure. There is first an<br />

enthalpy cost to pull each atom out <strong>of</strong> its elemental standard state – always a non-negative<br />

quantity, since the elemental standard states are chosen to be the most stable forms. This

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!