07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10<br />

Thermodynamic Properties<br />

10.1 Microscopic–macroscopic Connection<br />

In the very recent past, it has become possible under certain circumstances to observe<br />

single molecules in the laboratory. Nevertheless, the vast majority <strong>of</strong> chemical research<br />

concerns itself not with individual molecules, but instead with macroscopic quantities <strong>of</strong><br />

matter that are made up <strong>of</strong> unimaginably large numbers <strong>of</strong> molecules. The behavior <strong>of</strong> such<br />

ensembles <strong>of</strong> molecules is governed by the empirically determined laws <strong>of</strong> thermodynamics,<br />

and most chemical reactions and many chemical properties are defined in terms <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong><br />

the fundamental variables <strong>of</strong> thermodynamics, such as enthalpy, entropy, free energy, and<br />

others.<br />

Until now, we have for the most part concerned ourselves only with the potential and<br />

kinetic energies <strong>of</strong> individual electrons and nuclei in single molecules, and one <strong>of</strong> our rare<br />

connections to thermodynamics has been in some sense a misleading one, namely that we<br />

have <strong>of</strong>ten converted atomic units into other units more typically associated with macroscopic<br />

quantities, e.g., kcal mol −1 or kJ mol −1 . This sometimes leads newcomers to the field to<br />

think <strong>of</strong> the atomic unit <strong>of</strong> energy, the hartree, as being enormously large, since 1 Eh is<br />

equal to 627.51 kcal mol −1 . In reality, however, the hartree is a tremendously tiny unit,<br />

since ‘kcal mol −1 ’, as its name makes clear, refers to the energy associated with one mole<br />

(i.e., 6.0221 × 10 23 ) <strong>of</strong> molecules, not with the single molecule that is the typical subject<br />

<strong>of</strong> an electronic-structure calculation. Moreover, when we make comparisons between two<br />

different calculations, say to determine the relative energies <strong>of</strong> two isomers, and we carry<br />

out such simple unit conversions, we tacitly (and <strong>of</strong>ten incorrectly) assume that the potential<br />

energy difference determined from the calculation is all that matters when comparing to<br />

a measured energy difference, that is almost always in the form <strong>of</strong> some thermodynamic<br />

quantity, most typically enthalpy or free energy.<br />

In this chapter, the most common procedures for augmenting electronic-structure calculations<br />

in order to convert single-molecule potential energies to ensemble thermodynamic<br />

variables will be detailed, and key potential ambiguities and pitfalls described. Within the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> certain assumptions, this connection can be established in a rigorous way.<br />

Note that the situation is less clear-cut for molecular mechanics calculations. As already<br />

discussed in Chapter 2, the ‘strain energy’ from a typical MM calculation must be thought<br />

<strong>Essentials</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Computational</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, 2nd Edition Christopher J. Cramer<br />

© 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd ISBNs: 0-470-09181-9 (cased); 0-470-09182-7 (pbk)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!