07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.5 TECHNICAL CAVEATS 375<br />

Table 10.3 Predicted heats <strong>of</strong> reaction and p-benzyne heats <strong>of</strong> formation<br />

(kcal mol −1 ) using isodesmic Eqs. (10.41)–(10.43)<br />

Isodesmic equation<br />

Theory Quantity (10.41) (10.42) (10.43) Experiment<br />

CASPT2 H o<br />

rxn,298 −68.1 −10.8 4.4<br />

H o<br />

f,298 129.6 136.1 138.2 138.0 ± 1.0<br />

CCSD(T) H o<br />

rxn,298 −76.0 −15.1 5.4<br />

H o<br />

f,298 137.5 140.5 137.2 138.0 ± 1.0<br />

and this degrades the performance <strong>of</strong> CASPT2. The CCSD(T) level, on the other hand,<br />

captures enough correlation energy (or enjoys some fortuitous cancellation <strong>of</strong> errors) that<br />

this equation gives an accurate heat <strong>of</strong> formation as well. Finally, Eq. (10.42), which involves<br />

exchanging aromatic C–H bonds for sp 3 C–H bonds causes both levels <strong>of</strong> theory to fall<br />

outside the experimental error bars by about 1 kcal mol −1 .<br />

10.5 Technical Caveats<br />

10.5.1 Semiempirical Heats <strong>of</strong> Formation<br />

Recall that semiempirical methods were parameterized in such a way that the computed<br />

electronic energies were equated with heats <strong>of</strong> formation, not computed enthalpies. Thus,<br />

when a semiempirical electronic structure program reports a 298 K heat <strong>of</strong> formation for<br />

AM1, for instance, the reported value derives from adding the atomization energy E to<br />

the experimental 298 K heats <strong>of</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> the atoms. Inspection <strong>of</strong> Figure 10.1 indicates<br />

that this will differ from the rigid-rotor-harmonic-oscillator computed result by ZPVE and<br />

the differential thermal contributions to the enthalpy <strong>of</strong> the molecule compared to the atoms.<br />

As a result, the ‘correct’ way to compute a heat <strong>of</strong> formation with a semiempirical<br />

Hamiltonian is somewhat ambiguous. Since experimental data were used to optimize the<br />

parameters, the ZPVE and differential thermal contributions have been absorbed into the<br />

semiempirical parameters, so one is not necessarily improving things by adding these<br />

quantities post facto. On the other hand, to the extent ZPVE and thermal contributions<br />

are included in the parameters, it is in a very average way, and by no means consistent<br />

with rigorous statistical mechanics. In the end, individual investigators must decide for<br />

themselves, on the basis <strong>of</strong> what they are studying, whether to compute thermodynamic<br />

variables at the semiempirical level or simply to accept the electronic energies as having the<br />

status <strong>of</strong> enthalpies.<br />

10.5.2 Low-frequency Motions<br />

In the limit <strong>of</strong> a particular vibration going to zero, we see from Eq. (10.1) that it ceases to<br />

contribute to the zero-point vibrational energy. However, it is less obvious what happens to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!