07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

258 8 DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY<br />

empirical parameters appear, which necessarily introduce some kinetic energy correction if<br />

they are based on experiment.<br />

In discussing the nature <strong>of</strong> various functionals, it is convenient to adopt some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

notation commonly used in the field. For instance, the functional dependence <strong>of</strong> Exc on the<br />

electron density is expressed as an interaction between the electron density and an ‘energy<br />

density’ εxc that is dependent on the electron density, viz.<br />

<br />

Exc[ρ(r)] = ρ(r)εxc[ρ(r)]dr (8.22)<br />

The energy density εxc is always treated as a sum <strong>of</strong> individual exchange and correlation<br />

contributions. Note that there is some potential for nomenclature confusion here because two<br />

different kinds <strong>of</strong> densities are involved: the electron density is a per unit volume density,<br />

while the energy density is a per particle density. In any case, within this formalism, it is<br />

clear from inspection <strong>of</strong> Eq. (8.7) that the Slater exchange energy density, for example, is<br />

εx[ρ(r)] =− 9α<br />

8<br />

1/3 3<br />

ρ<br />

π<br />

1/3 (r) (8.23)<br />

Another convention expresses the electron density in terms <strong>of</strong> an effective radius such that<br />

exactly one electron would be contained within the sphere defined by that radius were it to<br />

have the same density throughout as its center, i.e.,<br />

<br />

3<br />

rS(r) =<br />

4πρ(r)<br />

1/3<br />

(8.24)<br />

Lastly, we have ignored the issue <strong>of</strong> spin up to this point. Spin can be dealt with easily<br />

enough in DFT – one simply needs to use individual functionals <strong>of</strong> the α and β densities<br />

– but there is again a notational convention that sees widespread use. The spin densities<br />

at any position are typically expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> ζ , the normalized spin polarization<br />

ζ(r) = ρα (r) − ρ β (r)<br />

ρ(r)<br />

(8.25)<br />

so that the α spin density is simply one-half the product <strong>of</strong> the total ρ and (ζ + 1), andthe<br />

β spin density is the difference between that value and the total ρ.<br />

8.4.1 Local Density Approximation<br />

The term local density approximation (LDA) was originally used to indicate any density<br />

functional theory where the value <strong>of</strong> εxc at some position r could be computed exclusively<br />

from the value <strong>of</strong> ρ at that position, i.e., the ‘local’ value <strong>of</strong> ρ. In principle, then, the only<br />

requirement on ρ is that it be single-valued at every position, and it can otherwise be wildly<br />

ill-behaved (recall that there are cusps in the density at the nucleus, so some ill-behavior

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!