07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12.2 COMPUTING FREE-ENERGY DIFFERENCES 441<br />

some distance <strong>of</strong> q0, since structures having values <strong>of</strong> q significantly different from q0 will<br />

be heavily penalized by addition <strong>of</strong> U.<br />

When this procedure is followed, a different probability function π ∗ (q) will be obtained<br />

over the sampled region. The correct PMF (i.e., for the unbiased potential) is related to the<br />

new probability function according to<br />

W(q) =−kBT ln π ∗ (q) − U(q)− kBT ln <br />

−U(q)/kBT<br />

e ∗<br />

(12.26)<br />

where the ensemble average is accumulated with the biasing function added to the system<br />

Hamiltonian. This function is quite simple to evaluate for a typical selection <strong>of</strong> U. However,<br />

it is <strong>of</strong>ten the case for an unknown PMF that a single choice <strong>of</strong> functional form for U<br />

will not lead to a statistically useful sample over the entire range <strong>of</strong> interest for q. Instead,<br />

one carries out several simulations, with different choices for U (for instance, by varying<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> q0 in Eq. (12.25)), and then patches together the relevant regions <strong>of</strong> the PMF to<br />

generate a single curve. This process is illustrated in Figure 12.5. Obtaining a good overlap<br />

<strong>of</strong> the individual pieces can be difficult in some instances, which contributes to error in the<br />

method when overlap is required. Indeed, Figure 12.5 is somewhat misleading, since each<br />

individual PMF fragment actually rises to infinitely positive free energy values at either end<br />

(that is, the probability <strong>of</strong> finding the system far to the right or left becomes so small that<br />

the corresponding free energy is very large). As these PMF walls have no physical meaning,<br />

but are artifacts <strong>of</strong> the umbrella function, they have been left out <strong>of</strong> Figure 12.5 for clarity,<br />

but in practice they can add to the difficulty associated with reliably overlapping different<br />

segments <strong>of</strong> the full reaction coordinate. The weighted histogram analysis method (WHAM;<br />

∆G<br />

R q P<br />

Figure 12.5 A reaction coordinate q constructed piecewise from reactants R to products P as a<br />

series <strong>of</strong> PMFs determined using different umbrella functions. The individual PMFs determined using<br />

Eq. (12.26), shown below the dashed line and taking each left endpoint as the relative zero, are held<br />

within their respective regions <strong>of</strong> the reaction coordinate by the umbrella function. Their overlap on a<br />

common energy scale generates the complete PMF shown above the dashed line

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!