07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.2.1 Functional Forms<br />

6.2 BASIS SETS 167<br />

Slater-type orbitals were introduced in Section 5.2 (Eq. (5.2)) as the basis functions used<br />

in extended Hückel theory. As noted in that discussion, STOs have a number <strong>of</strong> attractive<br />

features primarily associated with the degree to which they closely resemble hydrogenic<br />

atomic orbitals. In ab initio HF theory, however, they suffer from a fairly significant limitation.<br />

There is no analytical solution available for the general four-index integral (Eq.<br />

(4.56)) when the basis functions are STOs. The requirement that such integrals be solved by<br />

numerical methods severely limits their utility in molecular systems <strong>of</strong> any significant size.<br />

Nevertheless, high quality STO basis sets have been developed for atomic and diatomic<br />

calculations, where such limitations do not arise (Ema et al. 2003).<br />

Boys (1950) proposed an alternative to the use <strong>of</strong> STOs. All that is required for there to be<br />

an analytical solution <strong>of</strong> the general four-index integral formed from such functions is that<br />

the radial decay <strong>of</strong> the STOs be changed from e −r to e −r2<br />

. That is, the AO-like functions are<br />

chosen to have the form <strong>of</strong> a Gaussian function. The general functional form <strong>of</strong> a normalized<br />

Gaussian-type orbital (GTO) in atom-centered Cartesian coordinates is<br />

φ (x,y,z; α, i, j, k) =<br />

2α<br />

π<br />

3/4 i+j+k<br />

1/2<br />

(8α) i!j!k!<br />

x<br />

(2i)!(2j)!(2k)!<br />

i y j z k e −α(x2 +y2 +z2 )<br />

(6.2)<br />

where α is an exponent controlling the width <strong>of</strong> the GTO, and i, j, andk are non-negative<br />

integers that dictate the nature <strong>of</strong> the orbital in a Cartesian sense.<br />

In particular, when all three <strong>of</strong> these indices are zero, the GTO has spherical symmetry,<br />

and is called an s-type GTO. When exactly one <strong>of</strong> the indices is one, the function has axial<br />

symmetry about a single Cartesian axis and is called a p-type GTO. There are three possible<br />

choices for which index is one, corresponding to the px, py, andpz orbitals.<br />

When the sum <strong>of</strong> the indices is equal to two, the orbital is called a d-type GTO. Note<br />

that there are six possible combinations <strong>of</strong> index values (i, j, k) thatcansumtotwo.In<br />

Eq. (6.2), this leads to possible Cartesian prefactors <strong>of</strong> x 2 ,y 2 ,z 2 , xy, xz, andyz. These six<br />

functions are called the Cartesian d functions. In the solution <strong>of</strong> the Schrödinger equation for<br />

the hydrogen atom, only five functions <strong>of</strong> d-type are required to span all possible values <strong>of</strong><br />

the z component <strong>of</strong> the orbital angular momentum for l = 2. These five functions are usually<br />

referred to as xy, xz, yz, x 2 − y 2 ,and3z 2 − r 2 . Note that the first three <strong>of</strong> these canonical<br />

d functions are common with the Cartesian d functions, while the latter two can be derived<br />

as linear combinations <strong>of</strong> the Cartesian d functions. A remaining linear combination that<br />

can be formed from the Cartesian d functions is x 2 + y 2 + z 2 , which, ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it has<br />

spherical symmetry, is actually an s-type GTO. Different Gaussian basis sets adopt different<br />

conventions with respect to their d functions: some use all six Cartesian d functions, others<br />

prefer to reduce the total basis set size and use the five linear combinations. [Note that if<br />

the extra function is kept, the linear combination having s-like symmetry still has the same<br />

exponent α governing its decay as the rest <strong>of</strong> the d set. As d orbitals are more diffuse than s<br />

orbitals having the same principal quantum number (which is to say the magnitude <strong>of</strong> α for<br />

the nd GTOs will be smaller than that for the α <strong>of</strong> the ns GTOs), the extra s orbital does not<br />

really contribute at the same principal quantum level, as discussed in more detail below.]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!