07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8.3 KOHN–SHAM SELF-CONSISTENT FIELD METHODOLOGY 255<br />

8.3 Kohn–Sham Self-consistent Field Methodology<br />

The discussion above has emphasized that the density determines the external potential,<br />

which determines the Hamiltonian, which determines the wave function. And, <strong>of</strong> course,<br />

with the Hamiltonian and wave function in hand, the energy can be computed. However, if<br />

one attempts to proceed in this direction, there is no simplification over MO theory, since the<br />

final step is still solution <strong>of</strong> the Schrödinger equation, and this is prohibitively difficult in most<br />

instances. The difficulty derives from the electron–electron interaction term in the correct<br />

Hamiltonian. In a key breakthrough, Kohn and Sham (1965) realized that things would<br />

be considerably simpler if only the Hamiltonian operator were one for a non-interacting<br />

system <strong>of</strong> electrons (Kohn and Sham 1965). Such a Hamiltonian can be expressed as a sum<br />

<strong>of</strong> one-electron operators, has eigenfunctions that are Slater determinants <strong>of</strong> the individual<br />

one-electron eigenfunctions, and has eigenvalues that are simply the sum <strong>of</strong> the one-electron<br />

eigenvalues (see Eq. (7.43) and surrounding discussion).<br />

The crucial bit <strong>of</strong> cleverness, then, is to take as a starting point a fictitious system <strong>of</strong><br />

non-interacting electrons that have for their overall ground-state density the same density<br />

as some real system <strong>of</strong> interest where the electrons do interact (note that since the density<br />

determines the position and atomic numbers <strong>of</strong> the nuclei (see Eq. (8.2)), these quantities<br />

are necessarily identical in the non-interacting and in the real systems). Next, we divide the<br />

energy functional into specific components to facilitate further analysis, in particular<br />

E[ρ(r)] = Tni[ρ(r)] + Vne[ρ(r)] + Vee[ρ(r)] + T [ρ(r)] + Vee[ρ(r)] (8.14)<br />

where the terms on the r.h.s. refer, respectively, to the kinetic energy <strong>of</strong> the non-interacting<br />

electrons, the nuclear–electron interaction (Eq. (8.3)), the classical electron–electron repulsion<br />

(Eq. (8.4)), the correction to the kinetic energy deriving from the interacting nature <strong>of</strong><br />

the electrons, and all non-classical corrections to the electron–electron repulsion energy.<br />

Note that, for a non-interacting system <strong>of</strong> electrons, the kinetic energy is just the sum<br />

<strong>of</strong> the individual electronic kinetic energies. Within an orbital expression for the density,<br />

Eq. (8.14) may then be rewritten as<br />

E[ρ(r)] =<br />

+<br />

N<br />

i<br />

χi|− 1<br />

2 ∇2 i |χi<br />

<br />

nuclei Zk<br />

− χi|<br />

|ri − rk|<br />

k<br />

|χi<br />

<br />

N<br />

i<br />

<br />

χi| 1<br />

<br />

2<br />

ρ(r ′ )<br />

|ri − r ′ | dr′ <br />

|χi + Exc[ρ(r)]<br />

(8.15)<br />

where N is the number <strong>of</strong> electrons and we have used that the density for a Slaterdeterminantal<br />

wave function (which is an exact eigenfunction for the non-interacting system)<br />

is simply<br />

N<br />

ρ = 〈χi|χi〉 (8.16)<br />

i=1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!