07.04.2013 Views

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

Essentials of Computational Chemistry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

144 5 SEMIEMPIRICAL IMPLEMENTATIONS OF MO THEORY<br />

inspection. For the most complex element, a diagonal element, we have<br />

Fµµ = Uµ − <br />

ZB(µµ|sBsB) + <br />

<br />

Pνν (µµ|νν) − 1<br />

2 (µν|µν)<br />

<br />

B=A<br />

ν∈A<br />

+ <br />

Pλσ (µµ|λσ ) (5.12)<br />

B<br />

λ∈B σ ∈B<br />

where µ is located on atom A. The first term on the r.h.s. is the atomic orbital ionization<br />

potential, the second term the attraction to the other nuclei where each nuclear term is<br />

proportional to the repulsion with the valence s electron on that nucleus, the third term<br />

reflects the Coulomb and exchange interactions with the other electrons on atom A, and the<br />

final term reflects Coulomb repulsion with electrons on other atoms B.<br />

An <strong>of</strong>f-diagonal Fock matrix element for two basis functions µ and ν on the same atom A<br />

is written as<br />

Fµν =− <br />

<br />

3 1<br />

ZB(µν|sBsB) + Pµν (µν|µν) −<br />

2 2<br />

B=A<br />

(µµ|νν)<br />

<br />

+ <br />

Pλσ (µν|λσ )<br />

B λ∈B σ ∈B<br />

(5.13)<br />

where each term on the r.h.s. has its analogy in Eq. (5.12). When µ is on atom A and ν on<br />

atom B, this matrix element is written instead as<br />

Fµν = 1<br />

2 (βµ + βν)Sµν − 1<br />

2<br />

<br />

Pλσ (µλ|νσ) (5.14)<br />

λ∈A σ ∈B<br />

where the first term on the r.h.s. is the resonance integral that encompasses the one-electron<br />

kinetic energy and nuclear attraction terms; it is an average <strong>of</strong> atomic resonance integrals<br />

‘β’ times the overlap <strong>of</strong> the orbitals involved. The second term on the r.h.s. captures favorable<br />

exchange interactions. Note that the MNDO model did not follow Dewar’s MINDO/3<br />

approach <strong>of</strong> having β parameters specific to pairs <strong>of</strong> atoms. While the latter approach allowed<br />

for some improved accuracy, it made it quite difficult to add new elements, since to be<br />

complete all possible pairwise β combinations with already existing elements would require<br />

parameterization.<br />

The only point not addressed in Eqs. (5.12) to (5.14) is how to go about evaluating all<br />

<strong>of</strong> the necessary two-electron integrals. Unlike one-center two-electron integrals, it is not<br />

easy to analyze spectroscopic data to determine universal values, particularly given the large<br />

number <strong>of</strong> integrals not taken to be zero. The approach taken by Dewar and co-workers was to<br />

evaluate these integrals by replacing the continuous charge clouds with classical multipoles.<br />

Thus, an ss product was replaced with a point charge, an sp product was replaced with<br />

a classical dipole (represented by two point charges slightly displaced from the nucleus<br />

along the p orbital axis), and a pp product was replaced with a classical quadrupole (again<br />

represented by point charges). The magnitudes <strong>of</strong> the moments, being one-center in nature,<br />

are related to the parameterized integrals in Eq. (5.11). By adopting such a form for the<br />

integrals, their evaluation is made quite simple, and so too is evaluation <strong>of</strong> their analytic<br />

derivatives with respect to nuclear motion.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!