30.05.2013 Views

2012 Best Practices for Government Libraries

2012 Best Practices for Government Libraries

2012 Best Practices for Government Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

235<br />

BEST PRACTICES <strong>2012</strong><br />

Encouraging users to use search engines other than Google is another way to<br />

assist users to be more self-reliant internet searchers. Bingle (http://bingle.nu/) is<br />

good <strong>for</strong> showing users the different results when searching using Google and Bing.<br />

It presents side-by-side, on separate panes on one screen results in their native<br />

search environments. Bingle is aware that in some parts of the world (like in<br />

Australia) you cannot see Google search results (you used to). Providing these tools<br />

as a solo does saves you time and enables you to offer more in-depth specialized<br />

research services to other users.<br />

The Catalogue<br />

A tool that is often overlooked as a time-saver and assisting people to find<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation is the catalogue. For whatever reason, the catalogue is often the last<br />

place people search <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation. Often the search page is not very intuitive <strong>for</strong><br />

users. Whether one subconsciously takes on the general idea that more relevant<br />

and useful in<strong>for</strong>mation is out there on the internet and the library has only old<br />

“stuff” or some other reason, this attitude can diminish the value of the catalogue.<br />

This type of thinking has led to the barest minimum of in<strong>for</strong>mation being recorded,<br />

so that the catalogue becomes a poor tool <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation retrieval. The rationale<br />

behind this type of thinking is that time is saved <strong>for</strong> the provision of 'visible' or<br />

interactive library services that are seen of higher “marketable value’ than<br />

catalogue records. Cataloguing is seen as a “backroom” task not very important to<br />

adding to the value of the “frontline” library services. This is a false saving as the<br />

recording of more detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation especially internal departmental documents<br />

in a catalogue record does assist in the retrieval of unique and hard-to-find<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation. This does add significant value to the library service.<br />

No longer should the library catalogue be seen as just an inventory of items<br />

retained in the collection, but a tool <strong>for</strong> resource discovery with records linking to<br />

items and resources external to the collection. Even more so now with digitally<br />

born documentation, catalogues can be used to enhance in<strong>for</strong>mation retrieval<br />

through using metadata, in-house taxonomies, ontologies, etc.<br />

Depending on in<strong>for</strong>mation environment you work in, the catalogue can be used<br />

in other ways to assist in searching <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation. When working in an area where<br />

there are no commercial bibliographic databases that cover the department’s core<br />

business, consider cataloguing in<strong>for</strong>mation rich websites <strong>for</strong> inclusion into the<br />

library catalogue. This is a way of making the deep or invisible web in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

more visible to users. The websites catalogued would include those with grey<br />

literature or in<strong>for</strong>mation that search engines such as Google cannot uncover. This<br />

enhances the value of the content of the catalogue. You can then provide links from<br />

the catalogue to customised search engines, <strong>for</strong> the websites that can be searched<br />

by Google, etc. with a link “Search this or similar websites” It is also a way of<br />

keeping a history of websites. Often when organisations change or merge the<br />

website URL changes. Keeping a record can assist in future searching of the<br />

Internet Archive (www.archive.org) or other web archives. If making records of<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation rich websites is not relevant to your work situation consider adding the<br />

URL of the websites to author authority records to keep track of URL changes as a<br />

research tool.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!