01.06.2013 Views

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Instead, it can create problems for the people who use this and for the<br />

organization in which such people are working. C) Avoi<strong>de</strong>rs often go out<br />

of their way to avoid conflicts.<br />

3. Style of attackers. Attackers cannot keep their feelings to<br />

themselves. They are angry for one or another reason, even though it may<br />

not be anyone's fault. They express their feelings by attacking whatever<br />

they can even, though that may not be the cause of their distress. Attackers<br />

may be up-front or behind-the-back: a) Up-front attackers are the angry<br />

people who attack openly; they make work more pleasant for the person<br />

who is the target, since their attack usually generates sympathy, support<br />

and agreement for the target. B) Behind-the-back attackers are difficult to<br />

handle because the target person is not sure of the source of any criticism,<br />

nor even always sure that there is criticism.<br />

Types of conflict management<br />

Out of conflict styles response there are also studied the style of<br />

conflict management. Conflict management is a process in which conflict<br />

is used as a <strong>de</strong>liberate personal, social, or organizational tool. Reg Adkins<br />

consi<strong>de</strong>rs that there are at least four such styles, no one superior than other,<br />

but all <strong>de</strong>pend on the people, environment and the context: Competing;<br />

Avoiding; Harmonizing; Compromising.<br />

The avoiding style of conflict management is a nonconfrontational<br />

approach to problems. It involves passive behaviors such<br />

as withdrawing or si<strong>de</strong> stepping issues of contention in or<strong>de</strong>r to avoid<br />

issues which might be harmful to relationships involved. This approach is<br />

best used when disagreements <strong>de</strong>velop from minor unimportant issues.<br />

This is a useful technique when time is nee<strong>de</strong>d in or<strong>de</strong>r to gather additional<br />

information for informed <strong>de</strong>cision making. Unfortunately, sometimes the<br />

problems that are not quickly addressed tend to grow over time.<br />

Relationships can be damaged by unresolved issues. Overuse of this style<br />

can lead us into giving up too many of our personal goals and enable<br />

others to take advantage of us.<br />

The competing style of conflict management is an authoritarian<br />

approach to problems and involves only one si<strong>de</strong> getting their say. It is<br />

goal oriented and quick. It is most effective in conflict which involves<br />

personal differences that are unlikely to change. It is valuable as a counter<br />

measure in situations where others are likely to take advantage of those<br />

who display a non-competitive nature. It is also valuable in circumstances<br />

which require a quick <strong>de</strong>cision. Finally, one of its greatest values is in<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!