BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
making unpopular <strong>de</strong>cisions which need to be implemented. The down<br />
si<strong>de</strong> of the mo<strong>de</strong>l is the hostility it has a ten<strong>de</strong>ncy to breed in those on the<br />
losing si<strong>de</strong>. This is especially true when it is the only style of conflict<br />
management being utilized.<br />
The harmonizing style of conflict management puts the<br />
relationship of the interacting parties before the conflict at hand. When<br />
utilizing this technique you may find yourself giving in to the other person<br />
for the sake of the relationship. There are two situations in which this<br />
technique is particularly useful. One is when we are caught off guard by<br />
the conflict and the other party is well prepared. In these circumstances<br />
when we find ourselves situationally outmatched the technique allows us<br />
to save face and move forward. As second instance in which this technique<br />
is valuable is in the client service mo<strong>de</strong>l. It is nearly always more<br />
important to maintain a positive relationship with a client than it is to be<br />
victorious in a confrontation. This is especially true if you are goal<br />
oriented toward repeat business. On the other hand, when this technique is<br />
over used it can manifest some negative results. If you find yourself over<br />
utilizing this strategy and always putting the needs of other before your<br />
own you will find yourself with a buildup of feelings of resentment.<br />
Another negative result occurs when <strong>de</strong>aling with the unscrupulous. Those<br />
persons who perceive this technique as a weakness will always put their<br />
own interest in the self before the good of the many.<br />
Compromise is a technique often known as the "middle ground"<br />
approach. It supposes a negotiation process in which both parties give up<br />
something they want. Whatever one si<strong>de</strong> gets, the other si<strong>de</strong> loses. Neither<br />
si<strong>de</strong> gets what they want but both si<strong>de</strong>s make concessions in or<strong>de</strong>r to reach<br />
a conclusion that is equally acceptable to both. It is most useful when both<br />
parties are of equal stature and there is no simple solution. Unfortunately,<br />
no one is ever really satisfied with the results of this technique. But, at<br />
least both parties are equally dissatisfied.<br />
Ways of Conflict resolution<br />
The term "conflict resolution" refers to a range of processes<br />
aimed at alleviating or eliminating sources of conflict. Conflict resolution<br />
aims to end conflicts before they start or before they lead to verbal,<br />
physical, or legal fighting. This is different from conflict management, in<br />
which conflict is used as a <strong>de</strong>liberate personal, social, or organizational<br />
tool. Though conflict management is the more common road, it is not<br />
popular with practitioners of conflict resolution; it is better to avoid the<br />
140