APPENDICES. A systematic review and economic model of the ...
APPENDICES. A systematic review and economic model of the ...
APPENDICES. A systematic review and economic model of the ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Study Intervention Participants Outcomes<br />
Core symptoms<br />
Abbreviated Conners’<br />
Hyperactivity Questionnaire<br />
(parents, teachers)<br />
IOWA Conners’ Scales:<br />
inattention/overactivity (parents,<br />
teachers)<br />
TOTS: hyperactivity, attention<br />
(parents, teachers)<br />
Inclusion criteria<br />
(Unclear whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> following were inclusion criteria or a description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample)<br />
1. 5.6–11.9 years old<br />
2. Scheduled by <strong>the</strong>ir physicians for a trial <strong>of</strong> stimulants for problems related to ADD<br />
3. No organic brain disease, psychosis or uncorrected sensory deficits<br />
4. No current medication except treatment for allergies<br />
5. IQ score >80 on WISC-R within preceding year<br />
6. No previous psychotropic treatment<br />
Diagnostic criteria<br />
Parent <strong>and</strong> teacher rating scales were employed: Home Activity Scale, IOWA Conners’<br />
Scale <strong>and</strong> Conners’ Hyperactivity Questionnaire<br />
Arm 1<br />
MPH<br />
MPH plus placebo<br />
assigned on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong><br />
body weight; increased<br />
each week to a maximum<br />
average dose <strong>of</strong><br />
22.3 mg/day or 0.76<br />
mg/kg/day; administered<br />
three times daily (a.m.,<br />
noon, 4 p.m.)<br />
(Administered by school<br />
staff <strong>and</strong> parent)<br />
Reference<br />
Klorman et al., 1994 68<br />
Source<br />
CCOHTA Report<br />
Setting<br />
USA<br />
Design<br />
Crossover trial<br />
Co-existent problems<br />
IOWA Conners’ Scales:<br />
aggression/compositionality<br />
(parents, teachers)<br />
TOTS: aggression (parents,<br />
teachers)<br />
Child Psychiatric Scale: global<br />
disruptiveness (experimenter)<br />
Number<br />
Total r<strong>and</strong>omised = 114 (male = 85% <strong>of</strong> 107)<br />
Total withdrawals = 7<br />
Duration<br />
Referral period: 5 years;<br />
Treatment period:<br />
21 days per treatment<br />
arm<br />
Reasons for withdrawals:<br />
Withdrawn from trial: n = 2; consistently uncooperative in laboratory tasks: n = 2;<br />
experienced significant life events (remarriage or separation by parents) during trial:<br />
n = 2; incorrect dosage: n = 1<br />
Educational performance<br />
Not reported<br />
Arm 2<br />
Placebo<br />
Administered three times<br />
daily (a.m., noon, 4 p.m.)<br />
(Administered by school<br />
staff <strong>and</strong> parent)<br />
In addition, some outcomes were only reported for part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample, owing to<br />
incomplete returns or late introduction <strong>of</strong> some measures<br />
Purpose<br />
To investigate <strong>the</strong><br />
impact <strong>of</strong> stimulant<br />
<strong>the</strong>rapy on ADD<br />
children’s clinical<br />
response <strong>and</strong> specific<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> cognitive<br />
processing during<br />
memory search<br />
© Queen’s Printer <strong>and</strong> Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2006. All rights reserved.<br />
Psychological function<br />
Sternberg task: performance<br />
Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 23<br />
Depression or anxiety<br />
Not reported<br />
Age<br />
8.51 years (NC mean); 8.63 years (ADD mean); 8.62 years (ADD/O mean); 1.48 years<br />
(NC SD); 1.56 years (ADD SD); 1.64 years (ADD/O SD)<br />
Quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />
Teacher ratings<br />
Parent ratings<br />
IQ<br />
109 (NC mean); 108.84 (ADD mean); 108.97 (ADD/O mean)<br />
Adverse events<br />
Somatic complaints (parents)<br />
Mood problems (parents)<br />
Co-morbid disorders<br />
“… highly unlikely that any subject would have met DSM-III or DSM-III-R criteria for<br />
Conduct Disorder”; 1 subject met dual criteria for learning disorder<br />
Additional outcomes<br />
Weight<br />
EEG <strong>and</strong> EOG (electroculargraph)<br />
readings<br />
Diagnostic subtypes<br />
44/107 designated as ADD; 34/107 designated as ADD <strong>and</strong> oppositional disturbance<br />
(not CD) (ADD/O); 29/107 classified as meeting nei<strong>the</strong>r criterion (NC)<br />
Additional information<br />
Previous medication:<br />
None <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants had received previous psychotropic treatment. This was a<br />
requirement for entry into <strong>the</strong> trial<br />
Concurrent medication:<br />
All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants were drug free, except for occasional use <strong>of</strong> anti-allergy<br />
medication<br />
287