02.06.2013 Views

APPENDICES. A systematic review and economic model of the ...

APPENDICES. A systematic review and economic model of the ...

APPENDICES. A systematic review and economic model of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Study Intervention Participants Outcomes<br />

Core symptoms<br />

Abbreviated Conners’<br />

Hyperactivity Questionnaire<br />

(parents, teachers)<br />

IOWA Conners’ Scales:<br />

inattention/overactivity (parents,<br />

teachers)<br />

TOTS: hyperactivity, attention<br />

(parents, teachers)<br />

Inclusion criteria<br />

(Unclear whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> following were inclusion criteria or a description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample)<br />

1. 5.6–11.9 years old<br />

2. Scheduled by <strong>the</strong>ir physicians for a trial <strong>of</strong> stimulants for problems related to ADD<br />

3. No organic brain disease, psychosis or uncorrected sensory deficits<br />

4. No current medication except treatment for allergies<br />

5. IQ score >80 on WISC-R within preceding year<br />

6. No previous psychotropic treatment<br />

Diagnostic criteria<br />

Parent <strong>and</strong> teacher rating scales were employed: Home Activity Scale, IOWA Conners’<br />

Scale <strong>and</strong> Conners’ Hyperactivity Questionnaire<br />

Arm 1<br />

MPH<br />

MPH plus placebo<br />

assigned on <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong><br />

body weight; increased<br />

each week to a maximum<br />

average dose <strong>of</strong><br />

22.3 mg/day or 0.76<br />

mg/kg/day; administered<br />

three times daily (a.m.,<br />

noon, 4 p.m.)<br />

(Administered by school<br />

staff <strong>and</strong> parent)<br />

Reference<br />

Klorman et al., 1994 68<br />

Source<br />

CCOHTA Report<br />

Setting<br />

USA<br />

Design<br />

Crossover trial<br />

Co-existent problems<br />

IOWA Conners’ Scales:<br />

aggression/compositionality<br />

(parents, teachers)<br />

TOTS: aggression (parents,<br />

teachers)<br />

Child Psychiatric Scale: global<br />

disruptiveness (experimenter)<br />

Number<br />

Total r<strong>and</strong>omised = 114 (male = 85% <strong>of</strong> 107)<br />

Total withdrawals = 7<br />

Duration<br />

Referral period: 5 years;<br />

Treatment period:<br />

21 days per treatment<br />

arm<br />

Reasons for withdrawals:<br />

Withdrawn from trial: n = 2; consistently uncooperative in laboratory tasks: n = 2;<br />

experienced significant life events (remarriage or separation by parents) during trial:<br />

n = 2; incorrect dosage: n = 1<br />

Educational performance<br />

Not reported<br />

Arm 2<br />

Placebo<br />

Administered three times<br />

daily (a.m., noon, 4 p.m.)<br />

(Administered by school<br />

staff <strong>and</strong> parent)<br />

In addition, some outcomes were only reported for part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample, owing to<br />

incomplete returns or late introduction <strong>of</strong> some measures<br />

Purpose<br />

To investigate <strong>the</strong><br />

impact <strong>of</strong> stimulant<br />

<strong>the</strong>rapy on ADD<br />

children’s clinical<br />

response <strong>and</strong> specific<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> cognitive<br />

processing during<br />

memory search<br />

© Queen’s Printer <strong>and</strong> Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2006. All rights reserved.<br />

Psychological function<br />

Sternberg task: performance<br />

Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 23<br />

Depression or anxiety<br />

Not reported<br />

Age<br />

8.51 years (NC mean); 8.63 years (ADD mean); 8.62 years (ADD/O mean); 1.48 years<br />

(NC SD); 1.56 years (ADD SD); 1.64 years (ADD/O SD)<br />

Quality <strong>of</strong> life<br />

Teacher ratings<br />

Parent ratings<br />

IQ<br />

109 (NC mean); 108.84 (ADD mean); 108.97 (ADD/O mean)<br />

Adverse events<br />

Somatic complaints (parents)<br />

Mood problems (parents)<br />

Co-morbid disorders<br />

“… highly unlikely that any subject would have met DSM-III or DSM-III-R criteria for<br />

Conduct Disorder”; 1 subject met dual criteria for learning disorder<br />

Additional outcomes<br />

Weight<br />

EEG <strong>and</strong> EOG (electroculargraph)<br />

readings<br />

Diagnostic subtypes<br />

44/107 designated as ADD; 34/107 designated as ADD <strong>and</strong> oppositional disturbance<br />

(not CD) (ADD/O); 29/107 classified as meeting nei<strong>the</strong>r criterion (NC)<br />

Additional information<br />

Previous medication:<br />

None <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants had received previous psychotropic treatment. This was a<br />

requirement for entry into <strong>the</strong> trial<br />

Concurrent medication:<br />

All <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants were drug free, except for occasional use <strong>of</strong> anti-allergy<br />

medication<br />

287

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!