02.06.2013 Views

APPENDICES. A systematic review and economic model of the ...

APPENDICES. A systematic review and economic model of the ...

APPENDICES. A systematic review and economic model of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

322<br />

Appendix 12<br />

Core symptoms Educational performance Quality <strong>of</strong> life Adverse events<br />

The proportion <strong>of</strong> participants reporting appetite loss<br />

differed significantly between Arms 1 <strong>and</strong> 2, p = 0.001,<br />

<strong>and</strong> between Arms 1 <strong>and</strong> 3, p = 0.13, but not between<br />

Arms 2 <strong>and</strong> 3<br />

Natural setting: Abbreviated Conners’ Scale<br />

(teacher): mean (SD)<br />

Arm 1: 16.40 (7.74); Arm 2: 7.94 (5.83); Arm<br />

3: 7.82 (5.92)<br />

Significant differences between Arms 1 <strong>and</strong> 2,<br />

<strong>and</strong> between Arms 1 <strong>and</strong> 3 (p < 0.001)<br />

Natural setting: Abbreviated Conners’ Scale<br />

(parent): mean (SD)<br />

Arm 1: 19.91 (6.02); Arm 2: 11.41 (6.23);<br />

Arm 3: 9.49 (6.50)<br />

Significant differences between Arms 1 <strong>and</strong> 2<br />

(p < 0.001), Arms 1 <strong>and</strong> 3 (p < 0.001), Arms<br />

2 <strong>and</strong> 3 (p < 0.05)<br />

Laboratory setting: Abbreviated Conners’<br />

Scale (teacher): mean (SD)<br />

Arm 1: 7.03 (7.07); Arm 2: 4.03 (6.31); Arm<br />

3: 3.75 (6.66)<br />

Significant differences between Arms 1 <strong>and</strong> 2,<br />

<strong>and</strong> between Arms 1 <strong>and</strong> 3 (p < 0.001)<br />

Laboratory setting: Abbreviated Conners’<br />

Scale (counsellor): mean (SD)<br />

Arm 1: 12.70 (7.15); Arm 2: 9.91 (6.15); Arm<br />

3: 9.26 (5.73)<br />

Significant differences between Arms 1 <strong>and</strong> 2<br />

<strong>and</strong> between Arms 1 <strong>and</strong> 3 (p < 0.001)<br />

SKAMP Teacher ratings: graphical presentation<br />

only<br />

Conclusions Authors’ conclusions: This investigation supports <strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> Concerta long-acting formulation <strong>of</strong> MPH for parents who desire to<br />

have medication benefits for <strong>the</strong>ir child throughout <strong>the</strong> day <strong>and</strong> early evening<br />

Reviewer’s comments: No comments noted

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!