Complexity and Social Movements: Multitudes at the Edge of Chaos ...
Complexity and Social Movements: Multitudes at the Edge of Chaos ...
Complexity and Social Movements: Multitudes at the Edge of Chaos ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
160 The map is not <strong>the</strong> territory<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice. This moral judgement in <strong>the</strong> realm <strong>of</strong> intern<strong>at</strong>ional rel<strong>at</strong>ions where<br />
<strong>the</strong> legitim<strong>at</strong>e use <strong>of</strong> st<strong>at</strong>e violence is an expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body politic<br />
became a deterritorialising force as voters asserted <strong>the</strong>ir integrity <strong>and</strong> autonomy<br />
in <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> appeals to party discipline <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> thre<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> returning a<br />
Conserv<strong>at</strong>ive government by default. In <strong>the</strong> UK case <strong>the</strong> re-election <strong>of</strong><br />
Labour Party rebels prepared to vote against <strong>the</strong> Iraq war, identity cards <strong>and</strong><br />
a range <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r issues leaves Labour in <strong>of</strong>fice but arguably not in power.<br />
Whilst ‘e-government’ has progressively been enlarged <strong>and</strong> is claimed as<br />
an arena for transparency <strong>and</strong> communic<strong>at</strong>ion, this is not e-democracy. The<br />
formal democr<strong>at</strong>ic particip<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> citizen has not changed for centuries –<br />
requiring a cross on a ballot. The knowledge economy produces informed<br />
voters who are <strong>the</strong>n asked to abrog<strong>at</strong>e all decisional power to politicians<br />
<strong>and</strong> grant <strong>the</strong> rights to take <strong>at</strong> least 20% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir taxable income for <strong>the</strong><br />
next five years. Polling d<strong>at</strong>a regularly shows th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> moral politics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
contemporary UK elector prioritises health <strong>and</strong> educ<strong>at</strong>ion as <strong>the</strong>ir main<br />
concerns. E-democracy holds <strong>the</strong> potential to permit both instantly counted<br />
votes <strong>and</strong> a more sophistic<strong>at</strong>ed set <strong>of</strong> rights consistent with individual moral<br />
choices. The right to vire one’s taxes towards areas <strong>of</strong> public policy regarded<br />
as priorities <strong>and</strong> withhold <strong>the</strong>m from areas considered morally unacceptable<br />
would begin to make <strong>the</strong> Political reflect <strong>the</strong> cultural political sphere.<br />
De<strong>at</strong>h <strong>and</strong> taxes<br />
The idea th<strong>at</strong> de<strong>at</strong>h <strong>and</strong> taxes are <strong>the</strong> only certainties in life has been a<br />
central axiom <strong>of</strong> democr<strong>at</strong>ic <strong>the</strong>ory. Whilst campaigns to withhold <strong>the</strong> proportion<br />
<strong>of</strong> tax directed towards military budgets have been part <strong>of</strong> ‘peace<br />
movement’ tactics for some time, a proactive alloc<strong>at</strong>ion initi<strong>at</strong>ive would be<br />
a far more effective way for ‘consumers’ <strong>of</strong> political ‘services’ to express<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir desires. R<strong>at</strong>her than <strong>at</strong>tempting to <strong>at</strong>tract particip<strong>at</strong>ion by making<br />
access to <strong>the</strong> established system easier such a scheme would <strong>of</strong>fer voters <strong>the</strong><br />
incentive <strong>of</strong> ‘up stream’ influence. Permitting all voters to alloc<strong>at</strong>e a proportion<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir taxes between budgetary headings, perhaps 20% in <strong>the</strong> first<br />
instance, <strong>and</strong> aggreg<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong>se individual choices would effectively yield a<br />
‘peoples budget’ reflecting electoral preferences. If this alloc<strong>at</strong>ion reflected<br />
UK issue priorities <strong>the</strong>n health <strong>and</strong> educ<strong>at</strong>ion would be beneficiaries. The<br />
resultant ‘people’s budget’ would be a barometer against which overall st<strong>at</strong>e<br />
expenditure could be assessed. By limiting <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> individual’s tax<br />
take which could be vired, established core budgets rel<strong>at</strong>ing to long-term<br />
commitments would remain protected during a period when voters learned<br />
<strong>the</strong> implic<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>of</strong> particip<strong>at</strong>ion. Such a move would begin to invert political<br />
trust rel<strong>at</strong>ions within an increasingly particip<strong>at</strong>ory democracy with<br />
Politicians trusting publics to shape overall expenditure programmes. The<br />
resultant dialogical exchanges would shape <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> such<br />
extended democr<strong>at</strong>ic rights with governments having to justify <strong>the</strong> need for<br />
core areas <strong>of</strong> expenditure not prominently supported by expressions <strong>of</strong>