Complexity and Social Movements: Multitudes at the Edge of Chaos ...

Preface
This is a work of theory engaging with the increasing relevance of
complexity for the social sciences in the context of neo-liberal globalisation.
This theoretical work arises from decades of joint experience of, participation
in and commentary on grassroots movements and activism. It is thus
also a ‘non-manifesto’ addressing what we see as the emergent dynamics of
social change in the early twenty-first century. We offer the book simultaneously
to an academic and activist audience as an invitation to recognise
in the present a sets of stakes which have been repeatedly declared throughout
history, the emergent properties associated with contemporary
global dynamics and the reconfiguration of these as social forces with the
transformative potential to realise the ‘other worlds’ that are not only
possible but irresistible. If there is to be a social science of complexity
worthy of the name then appreciating such long-cycle iterations in
increasingly open natural and social systems is crucial. Such work is vital if
future orientations are to transcend the cyclical repetitions of boom–
bust/war–peace/in group–out group which characterised the long twentieth
century and which rapidly re-emerged following the hollow claims of a
‘new world order’ – an order which quickly degenerated into disorder. We
clearly prefer order on the edge of chaos to this sad repetition of ‘my/our
civilisation is better than yours’ bloodshed of the innocent.
As a ‘non-manifesto’ there is no blueprint here, though there are many
ideas for other forms of ‘order’ associated with minoritarian thinkers. The
arguments advanced point towards ways of relating which realise human
potential, prioritise the social and end the rule of economics as a discipline
by subordinating it to ‘democratically’ co-ordinated social forces. As this is
a ‘non-manifesto’ it is open to dialogical engagement rather than being a
‘you are either for this or against it’ statement. We anticipate not being
read in this manner but declare a willingness to respond in kind if this is
necessary and has creative potential.
We write as critically engaged actors in a style aimed at accessibility,
whilst aiming to avoid violence to sophistication and nuance. In doing so,
we hope a respect for academic detail is balanced by respect for the
theoretical significance of the day-to-day understandings of countless