Kanitzia 18. - NYME Természettudományi Kar - Nyugat ...

România. Chorology: DIHORU & NEGREAN 2009: 311).
236. Lamarckia aurea (L.) Moench /POA/ – Banat, saxa calcarea (KOCH 1848: 393). Obs.
The only mention, ignored by later authors.
237. Lappula heteracantha (Ledeb.) Gürcke (incl. Lappula semicincta (Steven) Popov)
/BOR/ – ″CJ: Cheile Turzii. BZ: Cărpiniştea (ZAHARIADI 1964: 192). CJ: Dej pe Valea
Chiejdului. VS: Târzii″ (BELDIE & VÁCZY 1976: 46).
238. Laserpitium hispidum M. Bieb. /LAM/ – BV: Măgurele (HELTMANN 1968: 45; NEG-
REAN 1987: 450).
239. Laserpitium siler L. (Siler montanum Crantz). /LAM/ – Munţii Bârsei: Cristianul
Mare, Piatra Mare, Bucegi (BAUMGARTEN 1816: 229), a presence contested by Simonkai
(1887: 268). Munţii Căpăţânii, VL: Cheile Bistriţei la Bulz, 1000 m alt. /only one amputated
copy [BUCA] (TODOR & POPESCU 1972: 287; BELDIE & VÁCZY 1976: 44).
240. Lathraea clandestina L. /SCR/ – SM: Carei /Nagykároly, Karol/, parasiting Vitis
vinifera, 1911 (Nagykároly és vidéke, Nagykároly /Carei/, XVIII, 1911, (mai), nr. 21: 5-6;
KARÁCSONYI 1995: 82).
241. Lathyrus laxiflorus (Desf.) O. Kuntze (L. inermis Roch. ex Friv.) /FAB/ – MH: Govodarva,
Malovăţu (ROMAN 1961: 647; BELDIE & VÁCZY 1976: 42).
242. Lathyrus linifolius (Reichard) Bäsler (L. montanus Bernh.) /FAB/ – MH: Jupâneşti
W 300 m, 44°51′..28″N, 22°32′..″E, 17 IV 2007, G. Negrean (8814) [BUC]. Tagged with
a question mark in the Flora Romaniae, based on very old information, because of the harbarium
material missing: Moldova: Adjud (Brandza 1883: 546). "Transilvania, plurime
coronima (SCHUR, FUSS, CZETZ)" (GRINŢESCU I. & NYÁRÁDY 1957: 412). Obs. The synonyms
used by the Flora Romaniae (FR) for the plants have been reported by Simonkai
(1887: 197) in plants with yeloow flowers, not red ones, so that even an old mention in the
FR as Lathyrus montanus is wrong. The same goes for the plant published by Brandza as
L. montanus Godr. & Gren. (syn. Orobus luteus L.), which is also a plant with yellow flowers.
There is also herbarium material - Orobus tuberosus [CL 31.419], "Transylvania with
no location" (CIOCÂRLAN 2008). The fact that the collector originated from Transylvania
(com. verb. Ciocârlan) can’t be an argument in favor of the plant being native as in those
times exchanges of plants were frequent.
243. Lavatera trimestris L. /MLV/ – SV: Baia, subspont. (ŢOPA 1978: 42).
244. Ledum palustre L. /ERI/ – Continues to be mysterious for the Flora Romaniae (FR).
Older mentions in the literature are summarized in the FR (ŢOPA 1960: 121), concluding
that “it was no longer found again”. We find comments on this plant made by Simonkai
(1867: 388) where it is labelled with a question mark: "Keresztényhegység (J. Kl. in Sieb.
Quartal-schrift. III. (1793) 104)" – Talán Andromeda polifoliát látott az illető «(J. Kl.»,
mely a Ledumra sokban emlékeztet ... Even in the last synthesis on the Romanian Flora
(CIOCÂRLAN 2009: 585) it is marked with a ? concluding it seems to have disappeared
from the Romanian flora”. I found several herbarium sheets with this plant in the Herabarium
of the Institute in Bucharest [BUCA], collected by C. C. Georgescu at "Poiana
Ştampei", as Andromeda polifolia, rev. G. Negrean. I searched for it several times in Dorna
Depression and didn’t find it. During my travel in Sweden, I looked for Ledum palustre an
127