Kanitzia 18. - NYME Természettudományi Kar - Nyugat ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

present in Dobrudja by the Flora Romaniae. Mistakenly do CIOCÂRLAN & COSTEA (1997: 101) indicate the collibus Allah-Bair in Dobrudja instead of Salvia ×betonicifolia Etl., a taxon characterized in Germany, recently acknowledged as a synonym of Salvia nutans (Website). Conceding that the hybrid Salvia ×betonicifolia Etl. is a synonym of Salvia nutans is not correct. The illustration in the Romanian Flora vol. 8, Pl. 46, fig.1. is revealing, but the citation of it from Dobrudja is improper: “frequent in the steppes of Dobrudja” (RĂVĂRUŢ & NYÁRÁDY 1961: 270). Salvia ×betonicifolia Etling (S. ×"betonicufolia") from NE of Bulgaria (Kaliakra and Baltata, Davidoff 1905) cited by Flora of Bulgaria (MARKOVA 1989: 458) is perhaps the same plant. The Salvia ×betonicifolia Etling is considered as synonym of Salvia nutans in the same index! This must be incorrect, as the plant illustrated in Flora Romaniae volume 8 is certainly a hybrid. Thus, in the case of the Dobrudjan flora, the correct mode to cite it as a synonym is: Salvia ×betonicifolia auct. roman et bulg., a ‘plantae dobrogensem’, non Etling! I collected this hybrid in the vicinity of Balchik: Balchik WNW, vallis Balchik, 21 V 1999, socio cum S. nemorosa subsp. babadagensis et S. nutans L. [BUCA]; Balchik E, in collibus aridis, inter parentes, 10 VIII 1999, G. Negrean [HGN]; also in Tuzlata, 10 VIII 1999, G. Negrean [BUCA]. REFERENCES BELDIE A. (1977-1979): Flora României - determinator ilustrat al plantelor vasculare. - Bucureşti, Edit. Academiei Române. (1: 1-412, 1977; 2: 1-406, 1979). BORZA A. (1947-1949): Conspectus Florae Romaniae Regionumque affinium. - Cluj. (1-160 in 1947; pp. 161-360 in 1949). BRANDZA D. (1898): Flora Dobrogei. - Ediţie îngrijită de Sabba Ştefănescu, Bucuresci, Inst. Arte Grafice “Carol Göbl”. 1-490. CIOCÂRLAN V., COSTEA I. (1997): Flora Rezervaţiei botanice Dealul Alah Blair (Jud. Constanţa). – Acta Bot. Horti bucurest. (1995-1996): 97-104. CIOCÂRLAN V. (2000): Flora ilustrată a României - Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta. - Ediţia a doua revăzută şi adăugită, - Bucureşti, Edit. Ceres, 1138 pp. CIOCÂRLAN V. (2009): Flora ilustrată a României - Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta. /Ediţia a III-a/. - Bucureşti, Edit. Ceres, 1141 pp. DONNER J. (1990): Distribution maps to P. H. Davis, “Flora of Turkey, 1-10”. - Linzer Biol. Beitr. 22(2): 381-515. FĂGĂRAŞ M., ANASTASIU Paulina & NEGREAN G. (2008): Flora şi vegetaţia zonei costiere Cap Midia - Cap Kaliakra. pp. 71-269; 429-444. In: FĂGĂRAŞ M. (coord.) (2008): Biodiversitatea zonei costiere a Dobrogei dintre Capul Midia şi Capul Kaliacra. – Univ. Ovidius Constanţa, Edit. Ex Ponto 451 pp. GRECESCU D. (1909): Suplement la Conspectul Florei Române, plante ulterioare, adiţii şi rectificări însoţit şi de un Appendix final de plante rare aflate în România, până - Bucureşti, Inst. de Arte Grafice Carol Göbl, 1-220 pp + 6 pl. HEDGE I. C. (1972): Salvia L. pp. 188-192. In: TUTIN T. G. & al. (eds) Flora Europaea Vol. 3. Diapensiaceae to Myoporaceae. – Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1-370. pp. + 5 maps. 56
KANITZ Á. (1879-1881): Plantas Romaniae hucusque cognitas. - (Ephemeridi ad “Magyar Növénytani Lapok” 1-268). Claudiopoli: E. Demjén; Londini: Dulau & Co.; Vindobonae: W. Braumüller et fil. pp. 1-76: 1879; pp. 77-204: 1880; pp. 205-268, 1881. KOMAROV V. L. (ed.). (1934–1964): Flora URSS. Vols. 1-30. - Leningrad & Moskva. Additamenta et Corrigenda, Leningrad, 1973. MARKOVA M. (1989): Salvia. pp.: 442–466. In: KUZMANOV B. (ed.) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Bulgaricae 9. - Serdicae, Edit. Acad. Sci. Bulg. NYÁRÁDY E. GY. (1942): Új növények a Délkeleti-Kárpátok és a Feketetenger vidékének flórájához. - Acta Bot., (Szeged) 1(1-6): 31-45. PRODAN I. (1938): Conspectul Florei Dobrogei, partea III-a. - Bul. Acad. Înalte Stud. Agron. Cluj. 7: 16-102. PRODAN I. (1957): Contribuţii la flora R. P. R. (România). - Bul. Şti., Secţ. Biol., Şti.- Agric. (ser. Bot.), Acad. Română 9(4): 285-326. RĂVĂRUŢ M. & NYÁRÁDY E. I. (1961): Salvia L. pp. 235-278 + 688. In: SĂVULESCU T. (red. princip.), NYÁRÁDY E. I. (red. tomi) Flora României (Flora Romaniae) Vol. 8 - Bucureşti, Edit. Academiei Române, 707 pp. SÂRBU I. ŞTEFAN N., IVĂNESCU L. & MÂNZU I. (2001): Flora ilustrată a plantelor vasculare din estul României. Determinator, vol. II. – Edit. Univ. “Al. I. Cuza” Iasi. SĂVULESCU T. (ed.) (1952–1976): Flora României (Flora Romaniae). - Bucureşti, Edit. Academiei Române. Vol. 1-13. SĂVULESCU T. & ZAHARIADI C. (1934): Plantes nouvelles ou rares pour la flore de Bessarabie. - Bull. Sect. Sci. Acad. Roumaine 16 (8-9): 180-185. SOÓ R. (1965): Species et combinationes novae Florae Europae praecipue Hungariae. III. - Acta Bot. Hung. 11(1-2): 235-251. http://www.theplantlist.org/browse/. http://www.kew.org/herbarium/ http://www.golatofski.de/Pflanzenreich/gattung/s/salvia.htm 57
Page 1 and 2:
NYUGAT-MAGYARORSZÁGI EGYETEM SAVAR
Page 3 and 4:
K A N I T Z I A Kanitzia 18: 3-4 Sz
Page 5 and 6: In memoriam PRISZTER SZANISZLÓ PRI
Page 7 and 8: K A N I T Z I A Kanitzia 18: 7-12.,
Page 9 and 10: M., Priszter Sz., Csapody I., Szodf
Page 11 and 12: Osztálya által elindított „Mag
Page 13 and 14: K A N I T Z I A Kanitzia 18:13-28.,
Page 15 and 16: Rosa mollis SMITH, Engl. Bot., ed.1
Page 17 and 18: losis, fructibus globosis, 1-1,5 la
Page 19 and 20: 1. ábra. Rosa velebitica (BORBÁS
Page 21 and 22: „Alpok” (ROTHMALER 1967: „Kor
Page 23 and 24: 7. ábra 8. ábra. 7. és 8. ábra.
Page 25 and 26: „Prés de Dombresson” (№ 1735
Page 27 and 28: GULC KRAJŠEK S., TRČAK B. (2001):
Page 29 and 30: KAN I T Z I A Kanitzia 18:29-52., S
Page 31 and 32: egy részét képezi a szíkesekkel
Page 33 and 34: VÉGVÁRI 2011, Nekünk ez a puszta
Page 35 and 36: vonatkozik. Gyakran egyszerűen pad
Page 37 and 38: mézpázsitos, csetkákás, de kül
Page 39 and 40: telműen a szikes mocsárba tartozi
Page 41 and 42: jezések kombinálásával jöttek
Page 43 and 44: szakadozott gyep (SZABÓ 1965) szik
Page 45 and 46: A szíkfok jelentésszűkülése A
Page 47 and 48: A következőket példákat, mint k
Page 49 and 50: GRUBER F. (1954): Rét és legelő.
Page 51 and 52: SZABÓ J. (1861): Békés és Csan
Page 53 and 54: K A N I T Z I A Kanitzia 18: 53- 58
Page 55: in the Romanian part of Dobrudja (R
Page 59 and 60: K A N I T Z I A Kanitzia 18: 59-88.
Page 61 and 62: posals, the population-stands from
Page 63 and 64: extreme ecological conditions refle
Page 65 and 66: Fig. 1. Vegetation aspect with the
Page 67: at the NE part of the village, situ
Page 70 and 71: warming up-drying up processes, ind
Page 72 and 73: liance, keeping various steppic ele
Page 74 and 75: AKMAN Y., QUEZEL P., AYDOGDU M., KE
Page 76 and 77: MAGYARI E., CHAPMAN J., PASSMORE D.
Page 78 and 79: (SOÓ 1945); Laposdülő (Groapa R
Page 80 and 81: Number of relevé 1 2 3 4 5 6 7* 8
Page 82 and 83: Table 2. Bothriochloetum ischaemi N
Page 84 and 85: Number of relevé 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 K E
Page 86 and 87: Number of relevé 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 K F
Page 89 and 90: K A N I T Z I A Kanitzia 18: 89-194
Page 91 and 92: the “Romanian Botanical and Mycol
Page 93 and 94: 11. Agrostis albida Trin. (A. stolo
Page 95 and 96: m, 19 VI 2005, G. Negrean (N 6125)
Page 97 and 98: 270). Transilvania, Banat, Moldavia
Page 99 and 100: as new for Romania: IL: prope Urzic
Page 101 and 102: REAN & DIHORU 2009: 112). Cheia S,
Page 103 and 104: COV 1988: 10). Mangalia, above the
Page 105 and 106: 107. Chenopodium suecicum J. Murray
Page 107 and 108:
(MATHEW 1983). CS: Mehadia, Kovaz,
Page 109 and 110:
orreri (Newman) Newman ex Oberholze
Page 111 and 112:
Siriu: Poarta Vântului, alt. 1450-
Page 113 and 114:
Engelm. et var. dentata, VII-X, sin
Page 115 and 116:
167. Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl sub
Page 117 and 118:
sószopor/ et Hurezul-Mare /Nántü
Page 119 and 120:
Costea [BUAG] (CIOCÂRLAN & COSTEA
Page 121 and 122:
as well on ruderal places around ra
Page 123 and 124:
210. Hypecoum ponticum Velen. /PAP/
Page 125 and 126:
IV. (1772) 28. - Kerczesora legelő
Page 127 and 128:
România. Chorology: DIHORU & NEGRE
Page 129 and 130:
Buia & al., sub Statice gmelinii, j
Page 131 and 132:
& VÁCZY 1976: 442). TL: Culmea Pri
Page 133 and 134:
Fântâniţa (ZAHARIADI 1965: 150 a
Page 135 and 136:
ing its biology, chorology and taxo
Page 137 and 138:
soil, found between Sulina and Pesc
Page 139 and 140:
Muntele Piatra Craiului (Fuss apud
Page 141 and 142:
utpote Teritza raro, Aug., Baumgart
Page 143 and 144:
JOREAN et al. 1959: Tab. 5). AB: Va
Page 145 and 146:
Sfiştofca, Sulina, Caraorman, Sfâ
Page 147 and 148:
str. is present (Franz Speta, com p
Page 149 and 150:
appear in last work of Ciocârlan (
Page 151 and 152:
Limited factors: Albugo candida (Pe
Page 153 and 154:
Periprava, ad ripam lacum Razim, Sf
Page 155 and 156:
[HGN]. Cartier Grozăveşti, in loc
Page 157 and 158:
ŞTEFAN 1992: 137). “This species
Page 159 and 160:
11 V 2008, G. Negrean [HGN; CL 6606
Page 161 and 162:
15. ANČHEV M. & POLATSCHEK A. (200
Page 163 and 164:
62.BORZA Al., GERGELY I. & RAŢIU O
Page 165 and 166:
Veg. 45(1): 21-25. 109. CIOCÂRLAN
Page 167 and 168:
157. CONSTANTINESCU O. & NEGREAN G.
Page 169 and 170:
1997): 93-94. 205. DIHORU G. (2000)
Page 171 and 172:
Bul. Agric., 1926, 7, Ser. II, vol.
Page 173 and 174:
293. GREUTERW. (1966): Espèce méc
Page 175 and 176:
ideae). Helsinki. 340. JALAS J. & S
Page 177 and 178:
389. LUKÁCS B. A. SRAMKÓ G. & MOL
Page 179 and 180:
433. MORARIU I., collab. cum NYÁR
Page 181 and 182:
481. NYÁRÁDY E. I. (1939): Adnota
Page 183 and 184:
Opera Bot. 35: 1-188. 528. PERSSON
Page 185 and 186:
573. PUŞCARU-SOROCEANU Evdochia (c
Page 187 and 188:
621. SĂLĂGEANU G., BAVARU A. & FA
Page 189 and 190:
667. SÎRBU C. & OPREA A. (2008): N
Page 191 and 192:
715. ŢOPA E. (1963): Sugestii noi
Page 193 and 194:
(red. tomi) Flora României (Flora
Page 195 and 196:
K A N I T Z I A Kanitzia 18: 195-23
Page 197 and 198:
A cserjeszint szintén változóan
Page 199 and 200:
Meggyőzőbb különbségek mutatko
Page 201 and 202:
Az eredményeknél láttuk, hogy a
Page 203 and 204:
tatarico-Quercion, Ar: Artemisietea
Page 205 and 206:
KEVEY B. (2006b): A Somogyi-Dráva-
Page 207 and 208:
2. ábra. Karakterfajok csoporttöm
Page 209 and 210:
6. ábra: Néhány tölgy-kőris-sz
Page 211 and 212:
8. ábra. A tornyiszentmiklósi „
Page 213 and 214:
0,34 0,32 0,3 0,28 0,26 0,24 0,22 0
Page 215 and 216:
12. ábra. Néhány tölgy-kőris-s
Page 217 and 218:
15. ábra. Néhány tölgy-kőris-s
Page 219 and 220:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 221 and 222:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 223 and 224:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 225 and 226:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 227 and 228:
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Page 229 and 230:
Felvételi adatok 1/12. táblázat
Page 231 and 232:
2. táblázat. Karakterfajok csopor
Page 233 and 234:
3. táblázat. Karakterfajok csopor
Page 235 and 236:
4. táblázat. A Mura-vidék tölgy
Page 237 and 238:
6. táblázat. A Mura-vidék és a
Page 239:
KORREKCIÓ A Kanitzia 17. kötetéb
Page 242 and 243:
technicus”-ok elsajátítása né
Page 244 and 245:
sul a tanári szigorral és érték
Page 246 and 247:
The topic of the EMAPi was focused
Page 248:
BALOGH L, BOTTA-DUKÁT Z. (2011b):
show all

Kanitzia 18. - NYME Természettudományi Kar - Nyugat ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?