Kanitzia 18. - NYME Természettudományi Kar - Nyugat ...

utpote Teritza raro, Aug., Baumgarten" [CL] (BAUMGARTEN Mantissa 1846: 55-56; SI-
MONKAI1887: 45!; RAŢIU F. 1982: 151; FUSS 1848, Archiv; 1853/1854, Programm..). Munţii
Arpaşului (SCHUR 1866: 45; RAŢIU F. 1982: 151). Vârful Arpaşul (Auf den Glimmerschiefer-alpen
Muntele Arpaş, Căprăreasa (SCHUR 1866: 12). Arpaşul, Creasta Tărâţa, Ucea
Mare, Surul (NYÁRÁDY A. 1953: 567). "Pe piscurile culminante ale Surului, 2290 m, pe
lângă zăpadă veche" (GRECESCU & BARTOLOMEIU 1899: 1). Munţii Făgăraş, Surul etc. (PRO-
DAN 1939: 350; RAŢIU F. 1982: 151). "Munţii Cindrel, Vârful Cindrel (Schur 1866)"
(DRĂGULESCU 2003: 80). forma albiflora (Schur) A. Nyár. (Hecatonia glacialis Schur a.
albiflora Schur) - Munţii Rodna, "Auf dem Korondsys bei Rodna (RECKERT 1855: 17).
Kalk 6000-7000" (SCHUR 1866: 12; NYÁRÁDY A. 1953: 567). Munţii Bucegi (SCHUR 1866:
13). Obs. 1. Ciocârlan mentions it in his determinator without a coronym (2009: 167). 2.
Oprea’s indications (2005: 103) are mostly incorrect: !MM SM CJ BN HR CV BV SB (în
Munţii Făgăraş) AB HD BH AR TM GJ OT AG (Alexiu 1995) IS BT SV CT; Munţii Rodnei
pe Vf. Ineu şi Corongiş (Raţiu 1982; Roniker 2004); Făgăraş". 3. The plant is still mentioned
in Atlas Florae Europaeae on a map at a large scale, approx. in the region of the
mountains Ţarcu-Godeanu (JALAS & SUOMINEN (eds.) 1989: 194, map. 1852) (NEGREAN
& DIHORU 2009: 444). "The species was observed more recently in Făgăraşului Mountains,
from where it was cited in published phytosociological relevées [cf. 5, 6], yet no specific
site of occurrence was cited in these papers" (RONIKIER 2004: 6).
341. Ranunculus millefoliatus Vahl - GR: Budeşti, Lunca Argeşului, in arenosis [BUCA;
HGN] (NEGREAN 1968: 334). The plant at Budesti is R. millefoliatus. A recent mention
in din Cheile Lăpuşului (MM) is completely out of the natural areal and seems erroneous
to us (ARDELEAN et al. 2009). Obs. In Flora Europaea vol. I, the two species were separated.
In the second edition R. garganicus is passed into the synonymy ar R. mllefoliatus,
which has priorityspecifying "incl.", signifies not necessarily synonymous! Chorology:
DIHORU & NEGREAN 2009: 444. According to Ciocârlan (2009: 169) Ranunculus millefoliatus
growth in Calafat (DJ).
342. Ranunculus neapolitanus Ten. /RAN/ – DJ CT (CIOCÂRLAN 2009: 168). DJ: Pisculeţ
[Herb. Muz. Olteniei 44.747] (CIOCÂRLAN & NĂSTASE 2001, new for România). Based on
the references of the Romanian botanists in Cadrilater (now NE Bulgaria) (PANŢU 1925;
PRODAN 1934) the plant was mentioned in Romania in Flora Europaea Ed. I. (TUTIN 1964).
They did not resume the subject in II edition. We find an intereseting observation in Prodan’s
work (1934: 112): ″Ranunculus lanuginosus L. in shady forests. Mănăstirea Cocoş
(Grecescu, SCFR 6). Probably similar to R. neapolitanus Ten.″ Indeed, it is quite unlikely
that R. lanuginosus grows in Dobrogea. Obs. The harbarium material leg. I. Lupe [BUCF]
proved to be R. oxyspermus Bieb. It was not found in the year after its finding in Oltenia
(Ciocârlan, com. verb.). Hagieni (PARINCU 1998). I have recently found the plant in Dobrudja,
in the area of Dobromir (G. Negrean). Chorology: DIHORU & NEGREAN 2009: 445.
343. Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All. subsp. orientale (L.) Arcang. (Cakile rugosa Baumg.;
Myagrum rugosum L.) /BRA/ – CJ: Cluj-Napoca [CL = 0, fide Simonkai] (Baumgarten
1816, II: 226; SIMONKAI 1887: 103; NYÁRÁDY E.I. 1955: 485). Cojocna (SCHUR 1866: 74;
NYÁRÁDY E.I. 1955: 485). "CJ: Turda; MS: Daneş, Sighişoara /Segesvár, Schässburg/,
Criş" (Baumgarten 1816, II: 226; SIMONKAI 1887: 103; NYÁRÁDY E.I. 1955: 485). SB:
141