historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...
historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...
historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
176 AZRIEL GORSKI<br />
and repetitive. One tends <strong>to</strong> teach <strong>the</strong> method and manner one<br />
learned. Thus, <strong>the</strong> tradition and manner of stitch<strong>in</strong>g tends <strong>to</strong> be<br />
transmitted <strong>from</strong> one person and generation <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> next. That is not<br />
<strong>to</strong> say that <strong>the</strong>re are not differences but <strong>the</strong> differences are more <strong>in</strong><br />
a range of expression for an <strong>in</strong>dividual sewer than <strong>in</strong> style and manner.<br />
From <strong>the</strong> characteristics outl<strong>in</strong>ed above, I will attempt <strong>to</strong> derive<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> manner of stitch<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> person or persons<br />
do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> stitch<strong>in</strong>g. The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />
Name<br />
Scroll<br />
Habakkuk<br />
Commentary<br />
Isaiah<br />
Manuscript A<br />
Cave 1<br />
Notes:<br />
Seam<br />
No.<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5 Bot<strong>to</strong>m<br />
5 Top<br />
5<br />
Repair<br />
Direction<br />
Z<br />
S and<br />
Straight<br />
Straight<br />
—<br />
Very<br />
S<strong>light</strong> S<br />
"Straight"<br />
Straight<br />
Straight<br />
Stitch<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Count<br />
Range<br />
per <strong>in</strong>ch<br />
7 <strong>to</strong> 9<br />
—<br />
5 <strong>to</strong> 6<br />
5*<br />
5 <strong>to</strong> 7<br />
5 <strong>to</strong> 6<br />
Random<br />
Average count of<br />
2, 3, 4 and 5 = 5.4<br />
* Based on holes<br />
Table 1: Stitch<strong>in</strong>g and thread characterization<br />
Count<br />
Average<br />
per <strong>in</strong>ch<br />
8<br />
—<br />
5.5<br />
5*<br />
5.5<br />
5.5<br />
No. of<br />
Strands<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
2**<br />
2<br />
?**#<br />
2<br />
2 or 4<br />
Folded<br />
over?<br />
Thread<br />
Twist<br />
Direction<br />
of Strand<br />
Z<br />
—<br />
Z<br />
Z**<br />
?***<br />
Perhaps S<br />
?**#<br />
Z<br />
S<br />
** Based on thread<br />
fragment<br />
Strand<br />
Comp.<br />
Fibers<br />
Fibers<br />
Fibers<br />
Fibers**<br />
Fibers<br />
?***<br />
Fibers<br />
Fibers<br />
*** Thread hidden by seam<br />
From <strong>the</strong> data <strong>in</strong> Table 1 we can see that <strong>the</strong> scrolls have been<br />
stitched at least four separate and dist<strong>in</strong>ct times. The average count<br />
<strong>in</strong> seam 1 of <strong>the</strong> Habakkuk Commentary is 8, while <strong>the</strong> count <strong>in</strong> seams<br />
2, 3, 4, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>to</strong>p and bot<strong>to</strong>m of seam 5 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Isaiah manuscript<br />
is approximately 5.5. This represents two separate events. The thread<br />
<strong>in</strong> seam 1 of <strong>the</strong> Isaiah manuscript is a s<strong>in</strong>gle-strand thread, while