18.07.2013 Views

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DESCRIPTIONS OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE 77<br />

five cubits wide and twenty cubits high, <strong>the</strong> height be<strong>in</strong>g a detail<br />

not mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bible. Indeed, it is probable that he imag<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

an extremely high set of chambers because of his view that <strong>the</strong><br />

Temple was 120 cubits high. He describes three sets, one on <strong>to</strong>p of<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r, and says that <strong>the</strong>y are "equal <strong>in</strong> proportion and number,"<br />

which seems <strong>to</strong> contradict <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g width of <strong>the</strong> consecutive<br />

layers of chambers mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bible. He also notes that <strong>the</strong><br />

height was equal <strong>to</strong> that of <strong>the</strong> lower s<strong>to</strong>ry, that is, <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> Temple<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g, and did not surround <strong>the</strong> upper s<strong>to</strong>ry. These structures<br />

<strong>the</strong>n would have been sixty cubits high. 25<br />

Josephus, <strong>in</strong> describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Herodian Temple of his own day (War<br />

5.220-21), mentions <strong>the</strong> chambers surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Temple. They<br />

had three s<strong>to</strong>ries and doors connect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m. He also <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />

<strong>the</strong>se chambers did not surround <strong>the</strong> upper s<strong>to</strong>ry of <strong>the</strong> Temple,<br />

which <strong>in</strong> his view was forty cubits high. Aga<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong> this account as<br />

well, he does not seem <strong>to</strong> allude <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> outward slant of <strong>the</strong> chambers.<br />

These same structures appear <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Temple plan of <strong>the</strong> Temple<br />

Scroll. Effectively, <strong>the</strong>se structures were part of <strong>the</strong> same build<strong>in</strong>g as<br />

housed <strong>the</strong> Temple. However, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y were entered <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> outside,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y were not considered <strong>to</strong> be part of <strong>the</strong> actual Temple. 26<br />

In this matter, <strong>the</strong> scroll, like Ezekiel, followed <strong>the</strong> plan of <strong>the</strong><br />

Solomonic Temple as known <strong>from</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gs. The term , res<strong>to</strong>red<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> scroll, would have designated this s<strong>to</strong>ried structure. 27 The term<br />

is used <strong>to</strong> designate <strong>the</strong> pavement or terrace upon which each<br />

s<strong>to</strong>ry is constructed. This pavement would have had <strong>to</strong> have been<br />

strong <strong>in</strong> order <strong>to</strong> support <strong>the</strong> next chamber, which protruded fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

out than <strong>the</strong> one below. 28<br />

The scroll does appear <strong>to</strong> differ <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> biblical sources followed<br />

25 The rest of his account (67) depends on <strong>the</strong> Septuag<strong>in</strong>t text, different <strong>from</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> MT-like text that is <strong>the</strong> basis of <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll. See Thackeray and Marcus,<br />

Josephus, Jewish Antiquities, 5.607 n. e.<br />

26 P. B. Bean, A Theoretical Construct for <strong>the</strong> Temple of <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll (Ph.D. diss.,<br />

University of Oregon, 1987), 326—27, suggests that <strong>the</strong> bot<strong>to</strong>m level also served as<br />

<strong>the</strong> foundation for <strong>the</strong> Temple <strong>in</strong> this plan.<br />

27 Mishnaic usage uses for this architectural term, follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> qere <strong>in</strong> MT.<br />

It ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> form <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g "couch, bed" as does MT. Yad<strong>in</strong> assumed<br />

that <strong>the</strong> scroll would have , <strong>the</strong> form found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ketiv. On <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

, see <strong>the</strong> detailed entry and footnote (n. 2) <strong>in</strong> E. Ben-Yehuda, A Complete Dictionary<br />

of Ancient and Modern Hebrew (New York: Thomas Yoseloff, 1960), 3.2121. See also<br />

b. B. Bat. 6la.<br />

28 For a different <strong>in</strong>terpretation accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> which it is a support for <strong>the</strong> roof<br />

beams of each level of chambers, see Albeck, Qodashim, 330-31.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!