historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...
historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...
historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
DESCRIPTIONS OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE IN<br />
JOSEPHUS AND THE TEMPLE SCROLL<br />
LAWRENCE H. SCHIFFMAN<br />
New York University<br />
Studies on <strong>the</strong> descriptions of <strong>the</strong> Jerusalem Temple found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
works of Josephus have generally concerned <strong>the</strong> correspondence<br />
between those descriptions and <strong>the</strong> Second Temple as it s<strong>to</strong>od <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> last days before its destruction. 1 Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, such studies have<br />
usually attempted <strong>to</strong> establish a correspondence between Josephus's<br />
accounts and <strong>the</strong> Temple plan found <strong>in</strong> Tractate Middot of <strong>the</strong><br />
Mishnah. 2 It has generally been assumed that some form of harmonization<br />
of <strong>the</strong> data <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two sources would yield a reasonable<br />
reconstruction of <strong>the</strong> architectural plan and appearance of what<br />
is generally termed <strong>the</strong> Herodian Temple—<strong>the</strong> Temple as rebuilt by<br />
K<strong>in</strong>g Herod (37-4 BCE). 3<br />
In his detailed <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll, Yigael Yad<strong>in</strong><br />
assumed that <strong>in</strong> some way <strong>the</strong> details of <strong>the</strong> Temple plan <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> completed Temple Scroll by <strong>the</strong> author/redac<strong>to</strong>r 4 paralleled <strong>the</strong><br />
Temple structure as it existed <strong>in</strong> his day—sometime <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early<br />
1 E.g., M. Avi-Yonah, "Beit Ha-Miqdash Ha-Sheni," <strong>in</strong> Sefer Yerushalayim (Jerusalem:<br />
Bialik Institute and Tel Aviv: Dvir, 1956), 392-418; S. Safrai, "The Temple," <strong>in</strong><br />
The Jewish People <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> First Century, ed. S. Safrai et al., CRINT 1/2 (Philadelphia:<br />
Fortress Press, 1976), 865-69. Cf. L. I. Lev<strong>in</strong>e, "Josephus' Description of <strong>the</strong><br />
Jerusalem Temple: War, Antiquities, and O<strong>the</strong>r Sources," <strong>in</strong> Josephus and <strong>the</strong> His<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
of <strong>the</strong> Greco-Roman Period: Essays <strong>in</strong> Memory of Mor<strong>to</strong>n Smith, ed. F. Parente and J. Sievers,<br />
Studia Post-Biblica 41 (Leiden: Brill, 1994), 233-46.<br />
2 A critical edition is available <strong>in</strong> A. S. Kaufman, Massekhet Middot, Shihzur Nusah<br />
Qadum (Jerusalem: Har Yera'eh Press, 1991).<br />
3 Such a syn<strong>the</strong>sis is opposed by Ch. Albeck, Shishah Sidre Mishnah, Qodashim<br />
(Jerusalem: Bialik Institute and Tel Aviv: Dvir, 1958), 313.<br />
4 Y. Yad<strong>in</strong>, The Temple Scroll, vol. 1 (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1983).<br />
Yad<strong>in</strong> saw <strong>the</strong> scroll as <strong>the</strong> product of <strong>the</strong> work of a s<strong>in</strong>gle author. Subsequent<br />
scholarship has identified several sources that were brought <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r by a f<strong>in</strong>al redac<strong>to</strong>r<br />
who was responsible for <strong>the</strong> complete scroll. See A. M. Wilson and L. Wills,<br />
"Literary Sources <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll," HTR 75 (1982): 273-88; M. O. Wise, A<br />
Critical Study of <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll <strong>from</strong> Qumran Cave 11, Studies <strong>in</strong> Ancient Oriental<br />
Civilization 49 (Chicago: Oriental Institute, 1990), 195-98; F. Garcia Mart<strong>in</strong>ez,<br />
"Source et redaction du Rouleau du Temple" Henoch 13 (1991): 219-32.