18.07.2013 Views

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SHELAMZION IN QUMRAN 63<br />

["If you will obey my commandments . . .] I will give <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>in</strong> of your<br />

land <strong>in</strong> its season, [<strong>the</strong> early ra<strong>in</strong> and <strong>the</strong> later ra<strong>in</strong>, that you may<br />

ga<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> your gra<strong>in</strong> and your w<strong>in</strong>e and your oil. . .]" (Deut. 11:13—14).<br />

Rabbi Nathan says: . . . [This refers <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> way ra<strong>in</strong>s] fell <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> days<br />

of Queen Shelamzion (Sifre Deut. 42). 10<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce I wish <strong>to</strong> make a case here for <strong>in</strong>tertextuality between this<br />

rabb<strong>in</strong>ic midrash and <strong>the</strong> Qumran pesher on Hosea, some observations<br />

on chronology are appropriate. The date of <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al redaction<br />

of Sifre Deuteronomy is not known exactly, but it is not earlier<br />

than <strong>the</strong> third century CE. Pesher Hosea A, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, is<br />

Qumranic, and could <strong>the</strong>refore not be dated much later than <strong>the</strong><br />

Herodian period. 11 If it <strong>in</strong>deed refers <strong>to</strong> political events dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

reign of Shelamzion, it also does not make sense that it was composed<br />

much later. Thus, <strong>to</strong> claim that a first century BCE document<br />

is found <strong>in</strong> dialogue with a third century CE compilation hardly<br />

shows sound <strong>his<strong>to</strong>rical</strong> judgement. I <strong>the</strong>refore suggest that we consider<br />

for a moment <strong>the</strong> composition of <strong>the</strong> rabb<strong>in</strong>ic midrash on Deut.<br />

11:13—14 <strong>in</strong>dependently of <strong>the</strong> compilation <strong>in</strong> which it is embedded.<br />

If we compare <strong>the</strong> rabbis' appraisal of Queen Shelamzion's reign<br />

with that of Josephus' Antiquities, we discover a strik<strong>in</strong>g disparity. The<br />

rabbis love her; Josephus, or ra<strong>the</strong>r his source, Nicolaus of Damascus,<br />

hates her (Ant. 13.430-32). Far <strong>from</strong> claim<strong>in</strong>g that one source is<br />

biased and that <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r is tell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> truth, I would claim that if<br />

rabb<strong>in</strong>ic literature preserves <strong>the</strong> pharisaic tradition <strong>to</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> degree,<br />

<strong>the</strong> midrash <strong>in</strong> Sifre is <strong>the</strong> appraisal of this reign by Shelamzion's<br />

co-rulers and Josephus' text is that of her detrac<strong>to</strong>rs (and particularly<br />

<strong>the</strong> Herodians who deposed her dynasty, and Nicolaus, <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

mouthpiece). When would <strong>the</strong> Pharisees have formulated <strong>the</strong> midrash<br />

10 A parallel tradition exists for this midrash <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tannaitic Sifra on Lev. 26:3-4<br />

("If you walk <strong>in</strong> my statutes and observe my commandments and do <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>the</strong>n I<br />

will give you your ra<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir seasons," Behuqotai 1:1), but I believe it is secondary,<br />

because it is more elaborate and also because <strong>the</strong> queen is no longer presented<br />

by herself <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> tradition but <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with Shimeon ben Shatah.<br />

11 On this date for <strong>the</strong> manuscript based on palaeographic considerations, see<br />

J. Strugnell, "Notes en marge du Volume V des Discoveries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Judaean Desert,"<br />

RevQ 7 (1969): 199.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!