18.07.2013 Views

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SHELAMZION IN QUMRAN 65<br />

<strong>the</strong> same va<strong>in</strong>: "You shall not abhor an Edomite, for he is your<br />

bro<strong>the</strong>r; you shall not abhor an Egyptian, because you were a<br />

sojourner <strong>in</strong> his land. The sons of <strong>the</strong> third generation that are born<br />

<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m may enter <strong>the</strong> assembly of <strong>the</strong> Lord" and <strong>the</strong> midrash adds<br />

"sons, not daughters" (Sifre Deut. 253). Sometimes <strong>the</strong> issue is not<br />

quite so simple. Deut. 15:12 reads "If your bro<strong>the</strong>r, a Hebrew man<br />

or a Hebrew woman, is sold <strong>to</strong> you, he shall serve you six years."<br />

On <strong>the</strong> complication that ensues <strong>in</strong> a case where <strong>the</strong> owner dies<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g this period, <strong>the</strong> midrash comments: "a Hebrew slave (cont<strong>in</strong>ues<br />

<strong>to</strong>) serve <strong>the</strong> son but not <strong>the</strong> daughter." Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>in</strong> Deut.<br />

19:17 it states: "Then both men disput<strong>in</strong>g shall stand before <strong>the</strong><br />

Lord." Here <strong>the</strong> midrash must concede "both men: does this refer<br />

only <strong>to</strong> cases were <strong>the</strong>re are two men? How about a man and a<br />

woman or a woman and a man or two women? It is written 'disput<strong>in</strong>g'—This<br />

means all." However, just <strong>in</strong> case we misunders<strong>to</strong>od<br />

<strong>the</strong> uniqueness of this case, <strong>the</strong> midrash adds: "Does this mean that<br />

a woman is a reliable witness? It is written here 'both' and it is written<br />

'both' elsewhere (verse 16). S<strong>in</strong>ce 'both' <strong>the</strong>re means men and<br />

not women, so <strong>to</strong>o here 'both' means men and not women" (Sifre<br />

Deut. 190). Thus even <strong>in</strong> cases that are not straightforward, <strong>the</strong><br />

gender-exclusive exegesis is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

The midrash on Queen Shelamzion is thus unique <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context<br />

of Sifre Deuteronomy <strong>in</strong> that it affirms <strong>the</strong> queenship of Shelamzion<br />

over and aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> exclusivist edi<strong>to</strong>rial approach of <strong>the</strong> compilation<br />

and specifically aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> texts that exclude women <strong>from</strong> queenship<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r leadership roles. This aspect, <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> considerations<br />

discussed above, confirms <strong>the</strong> relative antiquity of this text.<br />

We may thus conclude that <strong>the</strong> Qumranic midrash on Hosea is<br />

a sectarian response <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> notion circulated by <strong>the</strong> Pharisees that<br />

Queen Shelamzion's reign was so idyllic, that at that time <strong>the</strong> promise<br />

of God's bounty on earth was realised. The Dead Sea sect rejo<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by recruit<strong>in</strong>g a verse <strong>from</strong> Hosea—<strong>the</strong> biblical anti<strong>the</strong>sis of <strong>the</strong> verse<br />

of bounty <strong>from</strong> Deuteronomy—and apply<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> reign of<br />

Shelamzion (<strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> wan<strong>to</strong>n woman who, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir m<strong>in</strong>d,<br />

represented <strong>the</strong> queen). They also went on <strong>to</strong> refer <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> wars<br />

between <strong>the</strong> Queen's sons that raged after her death and <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> terrible<br />

fam<strong>in</strong>e that followed. 12 This was <strong>the</strong>ir answer <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> pharisaic<br />

propaganda.<br />

12 The notion that <strong>the</strong> queen is <strong>to</strong> blame for <strong>the</strong> sibl<strong>in</strong>g war that, after her death,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!