18.07.2013 Views

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

historical perspectives: from the hasmoneans to bar kokhba in light ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DESCRIPTIONS OF THE JERUSALEM TEMPLE 81<br />

The f<strong>in</strong>al aspect <strong>to</strong> be discussed here is <strong>the</strong> holy of holies. This<br />

section of <strong>the</strong> Tabernacle was ten cubits square. The twenty cubits<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll is <strong>the</strong> dimension given for <strong>the</strong> holy of holies <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Solomonic Temple plan <strong>in</strong> 1 Kgs 6:20 36 and 2 Chron. 3:8. This<br />

same dimension is given by Josephus for <strong>the</strong> Solomonic Temple (Ant.<br />

8.71). The Book of Ezekiel expected a holy of holies of <strong>the</strong> same<br />

size <strong>in</strong> its Temple as well (41:4). These same dimensions are given<br />

<strong>in</strong> Josephus's description of <strong>the</strong> Herodian Temple (War 5.219). In<br />

view of <strong>the</strong> unanimity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> measurement of <strong>the</strong> holy of holies, <strong>the</strong><br />

identification of <strong>the</strong> reference <strong>to</strong> twenty cubits <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll <strong>in</strong><br />

a fragmentary passage must be accepted as def<strong>in</strong>ite.<br />

When we review <strong>the</strong> dimensions of <strong>the</strong> Temple build<strong>in</strong>g itself, we<br />

see that Josephus and <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll shared <strong>the</strong> dimensions for <strong>the</strong><br />

sanctuary required by <strong>the</strong> biblical description of <strong>the</strong> Solomonic Temple.<br />

Josephus gives contradic<strong>to</strong>ry numbers for <strong>the</strong> dimensions of <strong>the</strong> facade<br />

of <strong>the</strong> portico of Herod's Temple. In any case, he described a much<br />

higher and grandiose fagade than that which <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll required,<br />

based on its particular biblical exegesis. Whereas Josephus spoke of<br />

120 cubits as <strong>the</strong> height of <strong>the</strong> portico, <strong>the</strong> height <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll<br />

was only sixty. Regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> holy of holies, Josephus and <strong>the</strong> Temple<br />

Scroll agree <strong>to</strong> a square structure of twenty cubits.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The descriptions of <strong>the</strong> Jerusalem Temple presented by Josephus and<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Temple Scroll share very little beyond basic details that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

derived <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> biblical material perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Solomonic Temple.<br />

The structure of <strong>the</strong> courtyards, <strong>the</strong> surround<strong>in</strong>g chambers, and <strong>the</strong><br />

fagades described are quite different. Several specific conclusions emerge.<br />

1. There is absolutely no chance that Josephus used <strong>the</strong> Temple<br />

Scroll or <strong>the</strong> architectural plan <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> it as a source.<br />

2. The ideals of <strong>the</strong> architect of that plan for a gargantuan,<br />

redesigned Temple were never realized, even when Herod's<br />

architects rebuilt <strong>the</strong> Temple.<br />

36 Understand<strong>in</strong>g as if it said , as <strong>in</strong> NJPS, "<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terior of <strong>the</strong> Shr<strong>in</strong>e."<br />

Cf. Rashi and Radak, ad loc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!