20.07.2013 Views

The Seven Strategies of Master Presenters - Lifecycle Performance ...

The Seven Strategies of Master Presenters - Lifecycle Performance ...

The Seven Strategies of Master Presenters - Lifecycle Performance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140 / THE SEVEN STRATEGIES OF MASTER PRESENTERS<br />

Remember, though, it is still the job <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Master</strong> Presenter to<br />

fill in any missing points, to elaborate on any points that might need<br />

clarification, and to bring some sense <strong>of</strong> order to the comments that<br />

were randomly <strong>of</strong>fered.<br />

2. Active vs. Passive Learning<br />

In passive learning, the participants are silent recipients <strong>of</strong> information<br />

that is all too <strong>of</strong>ten read to them. This is a technique that<br />

produces little, if any, long-term learning.<br />

In active learning, the participants are more than silent partners.<br />

In active learning, the participants receive the same information, but<br />

are encouraged to transmit information back. Think back to the best<br />

teacher you ever had. Chances are, he or she involved you in the<br />

learning process on a much higher level than mere listening. <strong>Master</strong><br />

<strong>Presenters</strong> depend on active learning techniques.<br />

Which would you prefer: a presenter who explains a concept and<br />

gives one or two examples before moving on, or a presenter who gives<br />

a concept and then divides the participants into groups and asks each<br />

group to give an example <strong>of</strong> how they can apply the concept in real<br />

life? Most people prefer the active learning approach over the passive<br />

listening style.<br />

In the active learning example just presented, there are four ways<br />

that the participants can be actively involved:<br />

1. <strong>The</strong>y can be asked to come up with a specific example<br />

<strong>of</strong> how the solution could be applied in real life.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong>y can be asked to listen carefully to the other<br />

examples in order to choose the one that they like best.<br />

3. <strong>The</strong>y can be asked to debate the merits <strong>of</strong> each<br />

proposed example in order to choose the one that the<br />

group will present.<br />

4. <strong>The</strong>y can be asked to listen carefully to see which<br />

group presents the best example(s) overall.<br />

In Brad’s two-day course Dealing With Workplace Conflict, he divides<br />

the participants into three groups and asks each group to read<br />

one <strong>of</strong> three different, short articles as homework. <strong>The</strong> first is “Thinking<br />

Outside <strong>of</strong> the Box,” 1 the second “Caught by Choice” 2 (a superbly<br />

crafted article on being caught emotionally in a conflict that we would<br />

be better <strong>of</strong>f not being caught in), and the third is “Inter-Departmental

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!