20.07.2013 Views

The Seven Strategies of Master Presenters - Lifecycle Performance ...

The Seven Strategies of Master Presenters - Lifecycle Performance ...

The Seven Strategies of Master Presenters - Lifecycle Performance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

86 / THE SEVEN STRATEGIES OF MASTER PRESENTERS<br />

Each sub-topic is supported by empirical evidence—the better<br />

the evidence, the better the presentation. Excellent evidence is surprising<br />

or unexpected, and the listener is rewarded by hearing the<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> the evidence and the thoroughness <strong>of</strong> the research.<br />

Functional Presentations<br />

Functional explanations help to deepen one’s understanding and<br />

appreciation <strong>of</strong> how things work or the benefits to be derived by using<br />

a particular product or procedure. Speakers like Susan Sweeney and<br />

Jim Carole help their audiences understand and appreciate various<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> the Internet and E-commerce. Or just flip on your television<br />

in the wee hours <strong>of</strong> the morning and you will be bombarded with<br />

speakers using functional organization: <strong>The</strong>re is one on every<br />

infomercial. This is their stock-in-trade. After 30 minutes, they have<br />

told you every possible use <strong>of</strong> their product (and then some). <strong>The</strong>y<br />

hold nothing back. If there is a function, you’ve heard about it by the<br />

time they finish.<br />

Contrasts and Comparisons<br />

Contrasts and comparisons actually work well together. For example,<br />

Dr. Janet Lapp uses the power <strong>of</strong> contrasts and comparisons<br />

to help explain how Americans and Canadians are similar and different.<br />

She also uses humor when advising Canadians who speak in<br />

America and for Americans who speak in Canada. A subset <strong>of</strong> contrasts<br />

is doing a pro and con analysis. For example, suppose your<br />

company is equally divided over starting a marketing campaign now,<br />

because the competition is slowly taking market share away from your<br />

division’s product, versus waiting six months to implement the plan,<br />

because a new innovative product is under development. We have<br />

found that when a topic spurs strongly held opposing points <strong>of</strong> view, it<br />

is desirable to first get agreement on common ground. <strong>The</strong>n acknowledge<br />

the arguments <strong>of</strong> the “opposite side” second, and advance your<br />

point <strong>of</strong> view last.<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> common ground in the previous example, the presenter<br />

may want to reiterate agreed upon principles <strong>of</strong> effective decision-making,<br />

the need to balance short-term and long-term goals, and<br />

the company’s mission to be both innovative and pr<strong>of</strong>itable. <strong>The</strong> presenter<br />

would then consider the arguments for increasing advertising

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!