13.08.2013 Views

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

STRENGTH OF ANISOTROPIC ROCK MATERIAL IN TRIAXIAL COMPRESSION<br />

in which<br />

A =− 1 ∂ F<br />

∂ K dK<br />

where K is a hardening parameter such that yielding occurs when<br />

dF =<br />

T ∂ F ∂ F<br />

{ ˙}+<br />

∂ ∂ K<br />

The concepts of associated plastic flow were developed for perfectly plastic <strong>and</strong><br />

strain-hardening metals using yield functions such as those of Tresca <strong>and</strong> von Mises<br />

which are independent of the hydrostatic component of stress (Hill, 1950). Although<br />

these concepts have been found to apply to some geological materials, it cannot be<br />

assumed that they will apply to pressure-sensitive materials such as rocks in which<br />

brittle fracture <strong>and</strong> dilatancy typically occur (Rudnicki <strong>and</strong> Rice, 1975).<br />

In order to obtain realistic representations of the stresses at yield in rocks <strong>and</strong> rock<br />

masses, it has been necessary to develop yield functions which are more complex than<br />

the classical functions introduced for metals. These functions are often of the form<br />

F(I1, J2) = 0 where I1 is the first invariant of the stress tensor <strong>and</strong> J2 is the second<br />

invariant of the deviator stress tensor (section 2.4), i.e.<br />

J2 = 1<br />

2<br />

S 2 1 + S 2 2 + S2 <br />

3<br />

= 1<br />

6 [(1 − 2) 2 + (2 − 3) 2 + (3 − 1) 2 ]<br />

More complex functions also include the third invariant of the deviator stress tensor<br />

J3 = S1 S2 S3. For example, Desai <strong>and</strong> Salami (1987) were able to obtain excellent<br />

fits to peak strength (assumed synonymous with yield) <strong>and</strong> stress–strain data for a<br />

s<strong>and</strong>stone, a granite <strong>and</strong> a dolomite using the yield function<br />

F = J2 −<br />

<br />

<br />

n−2<br />

0<br />

= 0<br />

I n 1 + I 2 <br />

1 1 − <br />

1/3<br />

J3 J 1/2<br />

m 2<br />

where , n, <strong>and</strong> m are material parameters <strong>and</strong> 0 is one unit of stress.<br />

4.6 Strength of anisotropic rock material in triaxial compression<br />

So far in this chapter, it has been assumed that the mechanical response of rock<br />

material is isotropic. However, because of some preferred orientation of the fabric or<br />

microstructure, or the presence of bedding or cleavage planes, the behaviour of many<br />

rocks is anisotropic. The various categories of anisotropic elasticity were discussed in<br />

section 2.10. Because of computational complexity <strong>and</strong> the difficulty of determining<br />

the necessary elastic constants, it is usual for only the simplest form of anisotropy,<br />

transverse isotropy, to be used in design analyses. Anisotropic strength criteria are<br />

also required for use in the calculations.<br />

The peak strengths developed by transversely isotropic rocks in triaxial compression<br />

vary with the orientation of the plane of isotropy, foliation plane or plane of<br />

weakness, with respect to the principal stress directions. Figure 4.33 shows some<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!