13.08.2013 Views

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18<br />

Monitoring rock mass<br />

performance<br />

18.1 The purposes <strong>and</strong> nature of monitoring rock mass performance<br />

Monitoring is the surveillance of engineering structures, either visually or with the<br />

help of instruments. In a general geomechanics context, monitoring may be carried<br />

out for four main reasons:<br />

(a) to record the natural values of, <strong>and</strong> variations in, geotechnical parameters such<br />

as water table level, ground levels <strong>and</strong> seismic events before the initiation of an<br />

engineering project;<br />

(b) to ensure safety during construction <strong>and</strong> operation by giving warning of the<br />

development of excess ground deformations, groundwater pressures <strong>and</strong> loads<br />

in support <strong>and</strong> reinforcement elements, for example;<br />

(c) to check the validity of the assumptions, conceptual models <strong>and</strong> values of soil<br />

or rock mass properties used in design calculations;<br />

(d) to control the implementation of ground treatment <strong>and</strong> remedial works such as<br />

ground freezing during shaft sinking or tunnelling through water-bearing ground,<br />

grouting, drainage or the provision of support <strong>and</strong> reinforcement.<br />

In mining rock mechanics, most monitoring is carried out for the second <strong>and</strong> third of<br />

these reasons. Monitoring the safety of the mine structure is a clear responsibility of the<br />

mining engineer. Monitoring to check the rock mass response <strong>and</strong>, as a consequence,<br />

adjust the overall mine design or take remedial measures, is equally important. It<br />

will be appreciated from the discussions presented throughout this book, that rock<br />

masses are extremely complex media whose engineering properties are difficult, if not<br />

impossible, to predetermine accurately ahead of excavation. It will also be clear that<br />

the models used to predict the various aspects of rock mass response to different types<br />

of mining procedure, are based on idealisations, assumptions <strong>and</strong> simplifications. It<br />

is vitally necessary, therefore, to obtain checks on the accuracy of the predictions<br />

made in design calculations. As illustrated in the design flow diagram of Figure 1.7,<br />

monitoring the behaviour of the rock mass surrounding the mining excavation is<br />

an integral part of a mine rock mechanics programme, <strong>and</strong> provides the feedback<br />

necessary to close the design loop. In some cases, the design may be based largely<br />

on the results obtained by monitoring trial excavations or the initial behaviour of<br />

the prototype excavation, with little or no reliance being placed on pre-excavation<br />

design calculations. This use of field observations of the performance of structures<br />

is central to the general practice of geotechnical engineering in which it is known as<br />

the observational method (Peck, 1969).<br />

Monitoring systems used in conjunction with modern large-scale underground<br />

mining operations can be very sophisticated <strong>and</strong> expensive. However, it should be<br />

remembered that valuable conclusions about rock mass response can often be reached<br />

from visual observations <strong>and</strong> from observations made using very simple monitoring<br />

devices. Items that may be monitored in an underground mining operation include<br />

543

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!