13.08.2013 Views

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRESENTATION OF STRUCTURAL DATA<br />

Downhole logging. The logging of core may be supplemented by logging of the<br />

borehole walls with a range of downhole tools such as borehole cameras, television<br />

cameras <strong>and</strong> geophysical tools. Optical imaging may be enhanced by the use of<br />

digital imaging software to process the signals received from a downhole scanner.<br />

The digitally recorded data yield high resolution colour images, enabling detailed<br />

measurements to be made of discontinuities (e.g. Kamewada et al., 1990, Goodman,<br />

1993) <strong>and</strong> mineralisation to be identified. However, it must be remembered that sampling<br />

issues such as the orientation bias <strong>and</strong> the lack of persistence data also apply to<br />

borehole imaging techniques.<br />

Geophysical logging systems consist of a downhole probe or tool attached to a<br />

multi-conductor electric cable often referred to as a wireline. Several types of geophysical<br />

devices may be combined to form one downhole logging tool. The most<br />

common types of downhole geophysical logging test include seismic velocity (full<br />

wave seismic logs), acoustic scanning, electrical resistivity, gamma-gamma <strong>and</strong> self<br />

potential. These logs may be correlated with rock types, material strengths <strong>and</strong> moduli<br />

(e.g. Schepers et al., 2001). The ISRM Commission (1981) has published Suggested<br />

Methods for the st<strong>and</strong>ard geophysical logging tests. The most useful device for making<br />

discontinuity measurements is the acoustic scanner, seisviewer or televiewer, which<br />

is able to provide oriented images of borehole walls at very fine resolutions (Hatherly<br />

<strong>and</strong> Medhurst, 2000).<br />

3.5 Presentation of structural data<br />

3.5.1 Major features<br />

The effective utilisation of geological data by a mining or rock mechanics engineer<br />

requires that the engineer must first be able to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> digest the data <strong>and</strong> to<br />

visualise their relation to the proposed mining excavation. It is necessary, therefore,<br />

that means be found of presenting the data so that the often complex three-dimensional<br />

geometrical relations between excavations <strong>and</strong> structural features can be determined<br />

<strong>and</strong> portrayed.<br />

Major structural features such as dykes, faults, shear zones <strong>and</strong> persistent joints<br />

may be depicted in a variety of ways. Their traces may be plotted directly on to mine<br />

plans with the dips <strong>and</strong> dip directions marked. Alternatively, structural features may<br />

be plotted, level by level, on transparent overlays which can be laid over mine plans<br />

so that their influence can be assessed in developing mining layouts.<br />

However, the most effective method of depicting major structural features is through<br />

the use of modern computer-based mine planning systems. These systems which are<br />

used at all major mines in one form or another, permit geological <strong>and</strong> geotechnical data<br />

to be integrated with mine planning <strong>and</strong> design systems. They are able to produce plan<br />

or sectional views as well as three-dimensional representations which can be rotated<br />

about chosen axes. Figure 3.20 shows such a depiction of two faults with orientations<br />

(dip/dip direction) of 70/255 <strong>and</strong> 70/319 intersecting stope development excavations<br />

in a bench-<strong>and</strong>-fill stoping block at the Neves Corvo mine, Portugal.<br />

3.5.2 Joints <strong>and</strong> bedding planes<br />

The data for joints <strong>and</strong> bedding planes differ in two significant respects from the data<br />

for major structural features such as faults. First, they are much more numerous, giving<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!