13.08.2013 Views

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 15.20 Early longitudinal<br />

sublevel caving layout for a narrow,<br />

steeply dipping orebody of varying<br />

width (after Sarin, 1981).<br />

SUBLEVEL CAVING<br />

small. In this case, the pillars would be expected to yield during the development stage<br />

which is probably unsustainable. However, it may be practicable, or indeed desirable,<br />

to design for yielding in the later stages of pillar life. At depths of more than 500 m,<br />

the sizes of solid pillars may become too large in terms of both safety <strong>and</strong> recovery.<br />

Large pillars can be potential sources of coal bursts or bumps, <strong>and</strong> may also fracture<br />

the roof or floor causing roof failure or floor heave. A layout using large pillars may<br />

leave uneconomically large volumes of coal behind <strong>and</strong> slow development because<br />

of the increased lengths of cross-cuts (Badr et al., 2002).<br />

A review of documented case histories of yield pillar performance in deep longwall<br />

coal mines carried out by Badr et al. (2002) showed that pillars having width to height<br />

ratios of three to five were more successful as yield pillars than those with other ratios.<br />

In this case, success was indicated by the absence of floor heave, bursts, bumps or roof<br />

problems. The analysis of yield pillar behaviour follows from the principles discussed<br />

in section 10.7. Because of the nature of the problem, a three-dimensional numerical<br />

analysis using appropriate constitutive laws is required. Badr et al. (2002) found that<br />

with the use of the finite difference code, FLAC3D, <strong>and</strong> non-linear constitutive models<br />

for the goaf, the analysis of a typical yield pillar problem was still a dem<strong>and</strong>ing task.<br />

15.4 Sublevel caving<br />

The essential features of sublevel caving, <strong>and</strong> the conditions best suited to its use,<br />

were outlined in section 12.4.8. The longitudinal sublevel caving method was developed<br />

for the mining of steeply dipping, narrow orebodies. In this case, the production<br />

headings are driven on strike as shown in Figure 15.20. For wider orebodies, a transverse<br />

sublevel caving method may be used with the production headings being driven<br />

across the orebody from footwall to hangingwall as shown in the generalised mining<br />

layout in Figure 12.13. The choice between longitudinal <strong>and</strong> transverse layouts<br />

453

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!