13.08.2013 Views

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 16.16 Progressive hangingwall<br />

caving at Grängesberg (after<br />

Hoek, 1974).<br />

MINING-INDUCED SURFACE SUBSIDENCE<br />

at the Grängesberg iron ore mine in Sweden. Figure 16.16 shows the progressive<br />

development of the subsidence zone at Grängesberg with increased mining depth<br />

over a 40-year period.<br />

This form of subsidence is often associated with mines in which the near-surface<br />

portions of the orebody have been extracted previously using open-pit methods.<br />

Alternatively, underground mining operations may commence in previously unmined<br />

ground at shallow depths below the surface. Figure 16.17 shows the sequence of progressive<br />

hangingwall failure postulated by Hoek (1974) for the cases of mining from<br />

an outcrop (a–e) <strong>and</strong> from an open pit (f–i). It is assumed that at each new stage of<br />

mining, a tension crack <strong>and</strong> a shear failure surface form in the hangingwall rock mass<br />

at a critical location determined by the strength of the rock mass <strong>and</strong> the imposed<br />

stresses. In some cases, mechanisms other than this may occur. As noted above for<br />

the case of block caving, major discontinuities such as faults may provide preferential<br />

shear planes. Alternatively, if a major set of persistent discontinuities dips steeply in<br />

a similar direction to the orebody, toppling of the hangingwall rock mass may occur<br />

(Figure 16.18).<br />

Hoek (1974) developed a limiting equilibrium analysis for predicting the progress,<br />

from a known initial position, of hangingwall failure with increasing mining depth.<br />

This analysis assumed a flat ground surface <strong>and</strong> full drainage throughout the caving<br />

mass. Brown <strong>and</strong> Ferguson (1979) extended Hoek’s analysis to take account of a<br />

sloping ground surface <strong>and</strong> groundwater pressures in the tension crack <strong>and</strong> on the<br />

shear plane. The idealised model used for the extended analysis is shown in Figure<br />

16.19. The variables involved in the analysis are:<br />

A = base area of wedge of sliding rock mass<br />

c ′ = effective cohesion of rock mass<br />

H1 = mining depth at which initial failure occurs<br />

H2 = mining depth at which subsequent failure occurs<br />

502

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!