13.08.2013 Views

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXAMPLES OF MONITORING ROCK MASS PERFORMANCE<br />

(b) a recognition of the low frictional resistance likely to be generated on smooth,<br />

continuous, graphite-coated <strong>and</strong> slickensided bedding planes; <strong>and</strong><br />

(c) an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the rôle played by rock mass stiffness in governing induced<br />

stress magnitudes.<br />

18.3.2 Convergence monitoring, production level, PT Freeport Indonesia’s<br />

Deep Ore Zone Mine, Ertsberg, Indonesia<br />

Undercutting at Freeport Indonesia’s Deep Ore Zone (DOZ) block caving mine commenced<br />

in 2000. The production or extraction level at a depth of about 1200 m below<br />

surface uses an offset herringbone layout as discussed in section 15.5.4. The production<br />

level will be eventually 900 m long <strong>and</strong>, on average, 200 m wide with widths of<br />

up to 350 m. Production drifts are on 30 m centres with drawpoints at 18 m centers<br />

along the drifts. A transition has been made from a post-undercutting to an advanced<br />

undercutting strategy. The undercut level is 30 m above the production level. These<br />

<strong>and</strong> other details of the layout <strong>and</strong> operation are given by Barber et al. (2000).<br />

The performance of the production level excavations is monitored using convergence<br />

stations, multiple point borehole extensometers, stressmeters <strong>and</strong> concrete<br />

crack observations (Rachmad <strong>and</strong> Widijanto, 2002). Cave propagation is monitored<br />

using time domain reflectometry (TDR) <strong>and</strong> surface subsidence in the mountainous<br />

terrain is monitored using aerial photography <strong>and</strong> TDR methods. The areas near critical<br />

surface installations are monitored in more detail using surveying techniques<br />

<strong>and</strong> extensometers (Rachmad <strong>and</strong> Sulaeman, 2002). The present account will concentrate<br />

on the use of convergence monitoring on the production level. Rachmad <strong>and</strong><br />

Widijanto (2002) found that the results of the convergence measurements were consistent<br />

with results obtained from the other types of measurement <strong>and</strong> so they became<br />

the main form of monitoring used. Subsequently, stress cells <strong>and</strong> MPBX installations<br />

were used only for special purposes.<br />

The convergence stations installed on the DOZ mine production level are as illustrated<br />

in Figure 18.1b. Convergence measurements are made manually, usually at<br />

weekly intervals, using a tape extensometer of the type shown in Figure 18.2. The<br />

convergence data are converted to vertical <strong>and</strong> horizontal components <strong>and</strong>, for purposes<br />

of analysis <strong>and</strong> visualisation, are plotted as displacement rates (mm/day) on<br />

production level plans using mine planning software as shown in Figure 18.13. As<br />

the examples to be given below illustrate, the convergence <strong>and</strong> convergence rate data<br />

are used to ensure safety during development <strong>and</strong> production, <strong>and</strong> to verify the design<br />

assumptions made about the response of the rock mass to caving, including the nature<br />

of the stress abutment associated with undercutting.<br />

High stresses associated with undercutting. Points 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 in Figure 18.13a are<br />

peaks of high vertical convergence rate located close to the undercut boundary. Such<br />

observations provide confirmation of the assumption that a concentration of vertical<br />

stress <strong>and</strong> an abutment stress zone will develop at the undercut boundary. More<br />

importantly, convergence rate data <strong>and</strong> observations of damage led to the conclusion<br />

that a displacement rate of 0.5 mm/day is a trigger value for action to limit further<br />

convergence. In the case of points 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 in Figure 18.13a, the peak convergence<br />

rates are greater that 0.5 mm/day <strong>and</strong> steps were taken to move the undercut front<br />

immediately (Rachmad <strong>and</strong> Widijanto, 2002).<br />

561

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!