13.08.2013 Views

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LONGWALL MINING IN HARD ROCK<br />

hydraulic props should be installed with an initial or pre-set load. In order to maintain<br />

the integrity of highly discontinuous hangingwalls, it may become necessary to increase<br />

the areal coverage by supplementing the prop <strong>and</strong>/or pack support close to<br />

the face with head boards, nets, link beams, cables or sprayed liners (Daehnke et al.,<br />

2001).<br />

The stope support design criteria proposed by Daehnke et al. (2001) include the<br />

height of the potential instability; quasi-static <strong>and</strong> dynamic stope closure rates; the<br />

compressive hangingwall stresses; discontinuity spacing, orientation <strong>and</strong> interface<br />

properties; the effect of support length or stoping width; the anticipated consistency<br />

of support performance; areal coverage; support element spacing; <strong>and</strong> the zone of<br />

support influence. The stope support design methodology generally used in South<br />

African gold <strong>and</strong> platinum mines uses a tributary area concept applied to the stope<br />

hangingwall. A given weight of rock, determined by the area in the plane of the<br />

reef <strong>and</strong> the height of a possible fall, is divided between a fixed number of support<br />

elements. This approach is analogous to the tributary area theory of pillar design<br />

discussed in section 13.3. For static or rock fall conditions, the maximum potential<br />

tributary area that can be supported by a single support unit, AT, isgivenby<br />

AT = F/gb (15.3)<br />

where<br />

F = maximum support unit load (N);<br />

= rock density (taken as 2700 kg m−3 );<br />

g = acceleration due to gravity; <strong>and</strong><br />

b = height of instability (m).<br />

For a comparable situation under dynamic or rockburst conditions, the support unit<br />

must be able to absorb both the kinetic <strong>and</strong> potential energy of the rock mass to be<br />

supported. An energy-based calculation allows the maximum tributary area of a single<br />

support unit to be expressed as a function of the unit’s energy absorption capacity <strong>and</strong><br />

the height of instability. For the example illustrated in Figure 15.6, the energy to be<br />

absorbed is given by<br />

Ea = 1<br />

2 mv2 + mgh (15.4)<br />

where<br />

m = bAT = mass of rock to be supported by the unit;<br />

v = rock ejection velocity (often taken as 3ms −1 );<br />

h = hangingwall displacement during the dynamic event (e.g. 0.2 m); <strong>and</strong><br />

Ea = energy absorption capacity of the support unit (J).<br />

Equation 15.4 may be re-arranged to give<br />

AT = Ea/ b 1<br />

2 v2 + gh <br />

(15.5)<br />

In their design approach, Daehnke et al. (2001) also use the zone of support influence,<br />

defined as the lateral extent of the vertical stress profile induced in the<br />

hangingwall beam by a loaded support unit. Here, the term lateral extent refers to<br />

the distance between the edge of the support unit <strong>and</strong> the point at which the stress<br />

437

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!