13.08.2013 Views

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE ELLIOT LAKE ROOM-AND-PILLAR MINES<br />

Equation 13.22 describes the bearing capacity developed under a long rib pillar.<br />

For pillars of length lp, the expression for bearing capacity is modified to reflect the<br />

changed pillar plan shape; i.e.<br />

qb = 1<br />

2 wpN S + c cot Nq Sq − c cot (13.23)<br />

where S <strong>and</strong> Sq are shape factors defined by<br />

S = 1.0 − 0.4(wp/lp)<br />

Sq = 1.0 + sin (wp/lp)<br />

The factor of safety against bearing capacity failure is given by<br />

FofS= qb/p<br />

i.e. it is assumed that the average axial pillar stress is equivalently applied as a uniformly<br />

distributed normal load to the adjacent country rock. The coarseness of this<br />

assumption justifies the practical choice of a factor of safety greater than 2.0.<br />

13.6 The Elliot Lake room-<strong>and</strong>-pillar mines<br />

The history of mining the uranium-bearing orebodies of the Elliot Lake district of<br />

western Ontario, Canada, is interesting because of the evolution of the mining layout<br />

<strong>and</strong> rock response as mining progressed down dip. <strong>Rock</strong> mechanics aspects of mine<br />

performance have been described by Hedley <strong>and</strong> Grant (1972) <strong>and</strong> Hedley et al.<br />

(1984). More than 30 years’ observations of roof <strong>and</strong> pillar performance are recorded<br />

for the orebodies.<br />

As described by Hedley et al. (1984), the conglomerate stratiform orebodies at<br />

Elliot Lake are set on the north <strong>and</strong> south limbs of a broad syncline. Figure 13.20 is a<br />

north–south cross section, looking east, showing the Quirke <strong>and</strong> Denison mines on the<br />

north limb. The orebodies are from3mto8mthick <strong>and</strong> dip south at about 15 ◦ –20 ◦ ,<br />

persisting to a depth of 1050 m. They are separated from the basement rock by a<br />

quartzite bed, <strong>and</strong> overlain successively by beds of quartzite, argillite, a massive 250<br />

m bed of quartzite, <strong>and</strong> conglomerate <strong>and</strong> limestone formations. Although the orebody<br />

rock is unbedded, the hangingwall contact is commonly a prominent bedding plane<br />

with an argillaceous parting. Diabase dykes <strong>and</strong> numerous normal faults transgress<br />

the orebodies, <strong>and</strong> several thrust faults are prominent features. The rock material<br />

strengths of the orebody, footwall <strong>and</strong> hangingwall rocks are generally greater than<br />

200 MPa. The pre-mining state of stress is defined by a vertical principal stress, v,<br />

equal to the depth stress, an east–west horizontal stress about 1.5 v, <strong>and</strong> a north–south<br />

component about equal to v.<br />

At the Quirke Mine, the mining method resembled that shown in Figure 12.2, with<br />

transport drifts developed along strike, at 47 m vertical intervals. This resulted in<br />

stopes with a down-dip dimension of about 76 m. Crown <strong>and</strong> sill pillars protected<br />

the rail haulages. Rib pillars, instead of the scattered, irregularly shaped panel pillars<br />

shown in Figure 12.2, separated the stopes which were mined up dip from the haulage<br />

level.<br />

391

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!