13.08.2013 Views

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 10.24 Relation between frequency<br />

of rockbursts, local ground<br />

conditions, <strong>and</strong> energy release rate in<br />

longwall mining of gold reefs (after<br />

Cook, 1978).<br />

ENERGY, MINE STABILITY, MINE SEISMICITY AND ROCKBURSTS<br />

of the intact rock. In hard rock mines, in addition to unstable material rupture, mine<br />

instability <strong>and</strong> seismicity may arise from unstable slip on planes of weakness such<br />

as faults or low-strength contacts between dykes <strong>and</strong> the country rock. For example,<br />

Stiller et al. (1983) record the similarity between many mine seismic events <strong>and</strong><br />

natural earthquakes in terms of the seismic signatures associated with the various<br />

events. Rorke <strong>and</strong> Roering (1984) report first motion studies which suggest a source<br />

mechanism involving shear motion. A dominant role for unstable fault slip as the<br />

source of rockbursts has been proposed by Spottiswoode (1984), <strong>and</strong> is supported by<br />

interpretation of field observations of rock mass deformation attending rockbursts<br />

reported by Ortlepp (1978). Confirming the observations by Ortlepp, Gay <strong>and</strong><br />

Ortlepp (1979) described in detail the character of faults induced by mining on which<br />

clear indications of recent shear displacement were expressed. The relation between<br />

rockbursts involving a crushing mode of rock mass deformation <strong>and</strong> those involving<br />

fault slip has been discussed by Ryder (1987).<br />

The mechanics of unstable slip on a plane of weakness such as a fault has been<br />

considered by Rice (1983). The interaction between two blocks subject to relative<br />

shear displacement at their contact surface is shown in Figure 10.25. The spring of<br />

stiffness, k, in Figure 10.25a represents the stiffness of the surrounding rock mass, <strong>and</strong><br />

the stress–displacement curve for the slider models the non-linear constitutive relation<br />

for the fault surface. In Figure 10.25b, the spring stiffness is greater than the slope<br />

of the post-peak segment of the load–displacement curve for the fault. This permits<br />

stable loading <strong>and</strong> displacement of the fault in this range. Figure 10.25c represents<br />

loading through a softer spring. In this case, the notional equilibrium position is<br />

unstable, <strong>and</strong> dynamic instability is indicated.<br />

To determine the final equilibrium position in the spring–slider system after unstable<br />

slip, it is necessary to consider the energy changes associated with the unstable<br />

302

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!