13.08.2013 Views

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

Rock Mechanics.pdf - Mining and Blasting

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PILLAR SUPPORTED MINING METHODS<br />

Lunder <strong>and</strong> Pakalnis (1997) <strong>and</strong> empirical strength formulae such as that introduced<br />

Hedley <strong>and</strong> Grant (1972) for factors of safety of 1.0 <strong>and</strong> 1.4 <strong>and</strong> width to height ratios<br />

of up to 1.5. The empirical data <strong>and</strong> the computed results were presented as plots of<br />

the ratio of pillar stress to unconfined compressive strength of the pillar rock material<br />

against the pillar width to height ratio for constant values of factor of safety.<br />

13.4 Design of a stope-<strong>and</strong>-pillar layout<br />

Design of a supported mining layout should seek to achieve the highest possible extraction<br />

ratio of mineral, while assuring locally stable stope spans <strong>and</strong> general control<br />

of near-field rock. In typical design practice, involving irregular stope-<strong>and</strong>-pillar geometry,<br />

it is usually preferable to apply one of the computational methods described<br />

in Chapter 6. These may be used to determine stress <strong>and</strong> displacement distributions<br />

associated with various extraction strategies, stope-<strong>and</strong>-pillar geometries, <strong>and</strong> stope<br />

mining sequences. However, it is useful lo explore some general aspects of stope-<strong>and</strong>pillar<br />

design, <strong>and</strong> mine layout, using the tributary area method. This is appropriate<br />

since there should be a convergence between the outputs of the independent methods<br />

of design analysis, for simple geometric conditions in a mine structure. Some broad<br />

geomechanical principles of mine layout may then be proposed from these generic<br />

studies.<br />

When the tributary area method of stress analysis is used in the design of a mining<br />

layout in a flat-lying, stratiform orebody, five parameters are involved in the design<br />

analysis. The field stress component, pzz, acting perpendicular to the plane of the<br />

orebody is determined by the geomechanical setting. The four variables to be established<br />

in the design process are the working or pillar height h, the room or stope span<br />

wo, pillar width wp, <strong>and</strong> the factor of safety, F, against pillar failure. Although the<br />

following discussion considers square pillars, of side length wp, it applies equally to<br />

long, rib pillars.<br />

As has been noted previously, the stope span which will ensure the local stability of<br />

the stope walls can be determined using the design procedures appropriate for isolated<br />

excavations. That is, stope span may be established independently of the other design<br />

variables.<br />

The selection of an appropriate factor of safety against pillar failure is based upon<br />

engineering experience. In his retrospective analysis of the in situ performance of<br />

South African coal pillars, Salamon produced the data shown in Figure 13.14. The<br />

histograms illustrate the frequency distributions of pillar collapse <strong>and</strong> intact, elastic<br />

pillar performance as a function of factor of safety. In particular, the distribution<br />

of intact pillar performance is concentrated in the range of F from 1.3 to 1.9. A<br />

reasonable design value of F in this case is suggested to be 1.6. In any other mining<br />

setting, a similar approach could be used to establish an appropriate factor of<br />

safety.<br />

These observations indicate that the remaining parameters to be determined in the<br />

design process are the pillar dimensions, wp, <strong>and</strong> the working height, h. At first sight,<br />

it may appear that a degree of arbitrariness is involved in the solution to the layout<br />

design problem. Consider the following example. A 2.5 m thick horizontal orebody is<br />

located at a depth of 80 m, with the rock cover having a unit weight of 25 kN m −3 .An<br />

initial mining layout is based on 6.0 m room spans <strong>and</strong> 5.0 m square pillars, with the<br />

384

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!